—“What’s the unbiased pros and cons of socialism, communism and capitalism?”— Each proposes a MONOPOLY, just as the abrahamic religions proposed a MONOPOLY – all monopolies are bad (and all monopolistic arguments are false) The only possible economic structure is a Mixed Economy, and the only structure that every has existed at any scale is a mixed economy. The underclass requires redistribution because they have no ability to participate in the market. Labor requires insurance against the vicissitudes of manual labor, the clerical and managerial classes require commons in order to produce multiples, the professional and entrepreneurial class require property and rule of law in order to produce the voluntary organization of production, the financial and political classes need organization such that they can produce redistribution, insurance, and property rights, so that all the classes can function as producers and consumers and parents and elderly. THE TRUTH OF RULE OF LAW VS RULE BY DISCRETION(MAN) If you practice rule of law – meaning the natural law of torts (not legislation, which is not law, but either contract or command. And commands are not laws, but commands alone), then you will produce a mixed economy. If you practice discretionary rule or legislative rule you will produce failed attempts at the MONOPOLIES of communism (underclass) socialism (working class), or capitalism (middle and upper middle class). When instead we require communism (redistribution), socialism (production of commons), and capitalism (production of goods, services, and information) in EVERY economy. THE ASHKENAZI (Authoritarian) VS EUROPEAN (Rule of Law ) DEBATE 1 – Germanics (Masculine) : Rule of Law and Mixed economies. 2 – French (Feminine): Republican Socialism 3 – Ashekanazi (authoritarian): Communism, Libertarianism, Neo-Conservatissm. 4 – Ashkenazi-Russian-Chinese (Authoritarian) : Communism, Socialism. However, the Ashkenazi and the French are the intellectual vanguard of authoritarianism, having produced every variation from Rousseau to the Postmodernists, and Marx/Boas/Freud/Cantor/Trostsky/Lenin/Mises/Rothbard all the way to the Frankfurt school. While the french retaliated against the english use of empiricism with their nonsense rationalism, and the germans imitated Rousseau with their nonsense moralism, it was the Ashkenazi of Europe, Russia, and America, who weaponized pseudoscience and propaganda against western civilization by creating pseudoscientific cults with false promise of economic and political paradise just as they had done so in the ancient world with false promise of life after death. Every time you ask the question which is better you are demonstrating that you have been the victim of a pseudoscientific cult in the modern world, just as your ancestors were the victims of supernatural cults in the anceient world. The only economy possible is a mixed economy.
Category: Economics, Finance, and Political Economy
-
THE LIE OF COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM, AND CAPITALISM —“What’s the unbiased pros and
THE LIE OF COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM, AND CAPITALISM
—“What’s the unbiased pros and cons of socialism, communism and capitalism?”—
Each proposes a MONOPOLY, just as the abrahamic religions… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=279756825954548&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-17 17:14:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1030503175378399232
-
My answer to What’s the unbiased pros and cons of socialism, communism and capit
My answer to What’s the unbiased pros and cons of socialism, communism and capitalism? https://www.quora.com/Whats-the-unbiased-pros-and-cons-of-socialism-communism-and-capitalism/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-17 17:13:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1030502817629396994
-
THE LIE OF COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM, AND CAPITALISM —“What’s the unbiased pros and
THE LIE OF COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM, AND CAPITALISM
—“What’s the unbiased pros and cons of socialism, communism and capitalism?”—
Each proposes a MONOPOLY, just as the abrahamic religions proposed a MONOPOLY – all monopolies are bad (and all monopolistic arguments are false)
The only possible economic structure is a Mixed Economy, and the only structure that every has existed at any scale is a mixed economy.
The underclass requires redistribution because they have no ability to participate in the market. Labor requires insurance against the vicissitudes of manual labor, the clerical and managerial classes require commons in order to produce multiples, the professional and entrepreneurial class require property and rule of law in order to produce the voluntary organization of production, the financial and political classes need organization such that they can produce redistribution, insurance, and property rights, so that all the classes can function as producers and consumers and parents and elderly.
THE TRUTH OF RULE OF LAW VS RULE BY DISCRETION(MAN)
If you practice rule of law – meaning the natural law of torts (not legislation, which is not law, but either contract or command. And commands are not laws, but commands alone), then you will produce a mixed economy.
If you practice discretionary rule or legislative rule you will produce failed attempts at the MONOPOLIES of communism (underclass) socialism (working class), or capitalism (middle and upper middle class). When instead we require communism (redistribution), socialism (production of commons), and capitalism (production of goods, services, and information) in EVERY economy.
THE ASHKENAZI (Authoritarian) VS EUROPEAN (Rule of Law ) DEBATE
1 – Germanics (Masculine) : Rule of Law and Mixed economies.
2 – French (Feminine): Republican Socialism
3 – Ashekanazi (authoritarian): Communism, Libertarianism, Neo-Conservatissm.
4 – Ashkenazi-Russian-Chinese (Authoritarian) : Communism, Socialism.
However, the Ashkenazi and the French are the intellectual vanguard of authoritarianism, having produced every variation from Rousseau to the Postmodernists, and Marx/Boas/Freud/Cantor/Trostsky/Lenin/Mises/Rothbard all the way to the Frankfurt school.
While the french retaliated against the english use of empiricism with their nonsense rationalism, and the germans imitated Rousseau with their nonsense moralism, it was the Ashkenazi of Europe, Russia, and America, who weaponized pseudoscience and propaganda against western civilization by creating pseudoscientific cults with false promise of economic and political paradise just as they had done so in the ancient world with false promise of life after death.
Every time you ask the question which is better you are demonstrating that you have been the victim of a pseudoscientific cult in the modern world, just as your ancestors were the victims of supernatural cults in the anceient world.
The only economy possible is a mixed economy.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-17 13:14:00 UTC
-
Commercial production will evolve to reflect the greatest demand.
No, you don’t understand. Commercial production will evolve to reflect the greatest demand. The aristocracy, the burghers, the craftsmen, the labor, the women, the underclass. It’s just that (a) people are no longer aspiring to consume in imitation of aristocracy, (b) people are no longer trying to aspire to, and consume in imitation of the middle class, (c) and instead are consuming as is the majority, the underclasses, who are, at present, signaling consumption by deformity rather than conformity. We call it individualism. It is. It’s just the only signaling available to them by consumption, rather than production or achievement.
-
Commercial production will evolve to reflect the greatest demand.
No, you don’t understand. Commercial production will evolve to reflect the greatest demand. The aristocracy, the burghers, the craftsmen, the labor, the women, the underclass. It’s just that (a) people are no longer aspiring to consume in imitation of aristocracy, (b) people are no longer trying to aspire to, and consume in imitation of the middle class, (c) and instead are consuming as is the majority, the underclasses, who are, at present, signaling consumption by deformity rather than conformity. We call it individualism. It is. It’s just the only signaling available to them by consumption, rather than production or achievement.
-
My answer to How does libertarian free market capitalism hypothetically deal wit
My answer to How does libertarian free market capitalism hypothetically deal with monopolies, infrastructure, and externalities such as air and water pollution? https://www.quora.com/How-does-libertarian-free-market-capitalism-hypothetically-deal-with-monopolies-infrastructure-and-externalities-such-as-air-and-water-pollution/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=f8db559c
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-14 20:08:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1029459726457860096
-
With an industrial base that buried the UK. With financials that bury the UK’s,
With an industrial base that buried the UK. With financials that bury the UK’s, and with the burden of east Germany, and the burden of postwar construction. lol
Why do you chipmunks even try? All you do is provide me and followers with humor.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-14 15:29:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1029389672676556802
Reply addressees: @Simonow_ @Hispanogoyim
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1029389114859286528
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1029389114859286528
-
What are you talking about? They are third after the USA and UK, and had postwar
What are you talking about? They are third after the USA and UK, and had postwar reconstruction to deal with?
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-14 15:26:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1029388736553996290
Reply addressees: @Simonow_ @Hispanogoyim
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1029386057371078656
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1029386057371078656
-
Aug 13, 2018, 9:35 PM
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-08-12/american-ownership-society-is-changing-thanks-to-technologyhttps://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-08-12/american-ownership-society-is-changing-thanks-to-technologyUpdated Aug 13, 2018, 9:35 PM
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-13 21:35:00 UTC