Category: Economics, Finance, and Political Economy

  • THINKING: If the FED doesn’t move for Trump then I think we have our excuse

    THINKING: If the FED doesn’t move for Trump then I think we have our excuse.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-21 19:17:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1164255101214744576

  • Of courses the Market does.On the other hand the laboring, working, and middle c

    Of courses the Market does.On the other hand the laboring, working, and middle classes blame the financial sector for driving down wages, by supplying cheaper goods to underclasses rather than taking the german strategy of quality goods and higher wages. NO CHERRY PICKING PLEASE.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-21 18:40:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1164245933493817345

    Reply addressees: @karlbykarlsmith

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1164245460867047424


    IN REPLY TO:

    @thesubtledoctor

    hawt! https://t.co/McMxyQVCZ9

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1164245460867047424

  • I’ve done the math over and over again, there is no possible way of surviving UB

    I’ve done the math over and over again, there is no possible way of surviving UBI. It’s just BUYING VOTES and that’s all.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-21 18:28:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1164242841171890177

    Reply addressees: @zatavu @AndrewYang

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1164167180956643328


    IN REPLY TO:

    @zatavu

    @AndrewYang In order to be able to afford a UBI, we need to eliminate literally every other welfare program (including/especially business subsidies of all kinds), deregulate the economy to get it growing faster, and cut the military budget by at least half.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1164167180956643328

  • 9) The reason being that at this rate of monetary velocity (and debt) efficiency

    9) The reason being that at this rate of monetary velocity (and debt) efficiency leaves little to no inventory in the supply chain, including the equipment to manufacture and repair the equipment.
    10) It will take about 1000 people to make this happen. Not 3M.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-21 14:57:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1164189788481708032

    Reply addressees: @KogutNikita @ScottMGreer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1164189291544793094


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @KogutNikita @ScottMGreer 6) And it will be almost impossible to stop.
    7) At 90 days the government will lose legitimacy and people will take any solution offered no matter how tyrannical.
    8) Given contemporary supply chains, if it continues for six months or longer, it will not be possible to recover.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1164189291544793094


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @KogutNikita @ScottMGreer 6) And it will be almost impossible to stop.
    7) At 90 days the government will lose legitimacy and people will take any solution offered no matter how tyrannical.
    8) Given contemporary supply chains, if it continues for six months or longer, it will not be possible to recover.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1164189291544793094

  • Because of our many differences, we are only compatible, and only compatible thr

    Because of our many differences, we are only compatible, and only compatible through exchange. We are not equal in cognition, emotion, want, or physical ability, nor do we have equal sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value.

    Moral people trade. You don’t.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-19 17:59:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163510887602409472

    Reply addressees: @MartinRobo123 @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163379142194282497


    IN REPLY TO:

    @MartinRobo123

    @NoahRevoy So you don’t believe in equality ever then? So how would you feel if you had daughters, instead of sons? Feminisism is about the equality of women, why is this a bad thing?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163379142194282497

  • Do you understand economics at all? Find a city that is not (a) on the verge of

    Do you understand economics at all?
    Find a city that is not (a) on the verge of bankruptcy, (b) burning through physical and institutional capital (c) turning into a favela.

    You don’t get it. You are moving to plantations where people don’t breed.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-18 20:58:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163193364164042752

    Reply addressees: @SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163172723595653126


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163172723595653126

  • Taxation is obtained by force. A price is paid voluntarily. One either creates c

    Taxation is obtained by force. A price is paid voluntarily. One either creates commons by paying for them or stealing from others to create them. What you mean is you want parasitism, predation, irreciprocity, and to achieve it by force, through the proxy of the vote.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-18 17:52:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163146597083095042

    Reply addressees: @SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163101943528603649


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163101943528603649

  • You mean, they promote methods of theft from men to women. Why do you cover thef

    You mean, they promote methods of theft from men to women. Why do you cover thefts, rent seeking, pseudoscience, sophism and lies instead of engaging in exchange? What do you have to offer such them men should not remove the thefts you impose upon them?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-18 13:39:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163082996360126467

    Reply addressees: @SignHexa @NoahRevoy @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163045608149663744


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1163045608149663744

  • They are serving their customers – the academy, and politicians and the investme

    They are serving their customers – the academy, and politicians and the investment community that give them consulting work. And favoring the short term as if consumption was all that mattered.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-16 21:59:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1162484010175647744

    Reply addressees: @ClownBa73413423 @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1162481325758124033


    IN REPLY TO:

    @FullAccountant

    @curtdoolittle @realDonaldTrump This is why I don’t understand why “top economists” and “experts” claim that the US will lose the trade war. Is this just ideological bias on their part?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1162481325758124033

  • TRUMP AND CHINA by Mike Streit If he only knew how easily he could crash chinas

    TRUMP AND CHINA

    by Mike Streit

    If he only knew how easily he could crash chinas economy. He could threaten to do exactly that and they’d concede to whatever he asked for.

    China has a massive demographics issue. The one child policy is great for population control but terrible decades later when you need a labor force big enough to keep your production costs below every other nations. Mexico has the labor force we need and they are conveniently located to our south. Lower production costs and lower transportation costs. But mike, Mexico doesn’t have the infrastructure, we are currently fixing that and pumping millions of cubic feet of natural gas to them daily. We are fixing their power problem thanks to our shale boom.

    Next up, China is the most over credited nation in the history of nations or credit. Every time they tighten the money supply to start fixing their problem, those they’ve employed thru false methods are liable to be left with the free time to remove those in power. Imagine if we just went out into Wyoming and built entire cities that could hold thousands of people and then left them empty. China has done just that. At one point, you could claim an idea for an invention, insure it and days later file an insurance claim against the invention saying it had failed. With no proof of anything ever existing. China has an Oprah problem with handing out jobs and cash for those jobs that it doesn’t have. How bad is it? An Obama stimulus package every 17-21 days bad.

    China has capital flight to the USA in the trillions. So many suspect it’s to buy up power over us. They know their economy is going to fail, it’s not if, it’s when. Getting back 10-50% of their money is still better than zero.

    Xi is playing hard ball to look tough. He’s also consolidating power as fast as he can.

    Can China make it a little rough on us for a little while? Absolutely. Long term, we can put the screws to them as hard as we want and there’s nothing they can do. 23% of their GDP is trade. Around 10% of ours is, of that 10%, half is with Canada and Mexico.

    We are also the only country with a navy capable of protecting or shutting down trade routes. We have 11 super carriers (the rest of the world has zero. The UK will have 2 by 2024 and they are being folded into our system). We have 11 of the 21 jump carriers, it takes 7 of those to equal 1 super carrier.

    Trump could easily explain all of these facts to China, tell them they can either agree to whatever we lay forth from now on without further international grand standing or that we will simply pull out the rug. What does that entail? It could actually be any number of things or multiples in concert. We could walk away from protecting oil shipments in the Middle East (China cannot go get their own oil, only japan has a deep water navy), we could ratchet up tariffs to a level that they couldn’t withstand (even with retaliatory tariffs its minimal damage here for maximum effect there), we could also stop all trade coming into or out of China from any nation (including China) that uses our currency as the middle man of exchange (Obama started this, trump turned it up to 11 and has it at his disposal whenever for whatever), we could block all shipments going into or out of China (this would be the most direct action and likely be considered an act of war by the entire international community, but nobody could actually stop us), it would be political suicide on trumps part but he could push us into a civil war or crash our economy (this is going to happen no matter what within the next few years anyway). I’m sure there’s others I’m forgetting, if you know any I missed please chime in.

    China’s economy is a house of cards, the slightest wind and it’ll all come crashing down.Updated Aug 16, 2019, 9:39 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-16 21:39:00 UTC