Category: Economics, Finance, and Political Economy

  • WILL AMERICAN-STYLE CAPITALISM STILL EXIST 100 YEARS FROM NOW? by Curt Doolittle

    WILL AMERICAN-STYLE CAPITALISM STILL EXIST 100 YEARS FROM NOW?

    by Curt Doolittle, Philosopher of political economy and founder of the Propertarian Institute.

    America doesn’t practice capitalism it practices rule of law, and as a consequence of rule of law, people are limited to survival in markets. Because western civilization began entrepreneurially, developed promise and contract, tort law and property, testimony and jury, we have long standing institutions for enforcing contracts, and long standing tradition of high trust. So for these reasons we could develop large scale organizations using contracts. These large scale organizations using contracts could organize a lot of money behind entrepreneurial ventures. Because of a combination of rule of law of tort, contracts, and large organizations, we could create high production capacity using high capital investment in machines, without resorting to central government control, militarizing people, serfdom or slavery to organize people into large working groups. And using this combination of law, contract, jury, large organizations, and technological innovation, we could drag humanity – resisting us, kicking and screaming – out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, early death, tyranny, and the chaos of natural forces, at the cost of creating uncertainty. So people traded poverty and certainty for prosperity and uncertainty. And people continue to make the choice every day. The communists (jews) invented the terms capitalism as a criticism, and socialism and communism as a false promise, as a means of restoring certainty and control over their lives. But neither socialism or communism is possible because both suffer from the four big problems of lack of incentives, and therefore laziness, the inability to use prices to efficiently organize an economy, and endemic corruption by state managed industries and the government, and the tendency of the people to vote themselves or demand themselves into tragedies ofthe commons: consumption higher than production.

    What the future will bring?

    In advanced countries one child policies: Automation will continue to drive down human labor markets until only a third of people, or maybe a fifth of people, can find employment, nd those people who work will end democracy and rule the people that can’t. The end result will be eugenics that suppressed the reproduction and consumption of those people who are unable to participate in production distribution and trade. IN poor countries they will forgo automation and continue to use labor, which will produce subsistence level for the poor and a small wealthy class.

    Just Like the rest of history.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 20:13:00 UTC

  • FULL-ACCOUNTING FIXES THE “ISMS” by Luke Weinhagen . Full-Accounting Fixes “isms

    FULL-ACCOUNTING FIXES THE “ISMS”

    by Luke Weinhagen .

    Full-Accounting Fixes “isms”

    Communism, as it has been practiced, has functioned to keep full-accounting out of community interactions.

    Capitalism, as it has been practiced, has functioned to keep full-accounting our of capital interactions.

    Parasites use both to extract value from our common interests at the discount available due to suppressing full-accounting.

    The solution… full-accounting.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-23 10:57:00 UTC

  • “People (division of labor) and prices (distribution of knowledge) have differen

    —“People (division of labor) and prices (distribution of knowledge) have different long term incentives. People have children, prices do not.”—Luke Weinhagen


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 11:39:00 UTC

  • ON FARMERS IN THE DIVISION OF LABOR (The flip side of “I, Pencil”.) (probably an

    ON FARMERS IN THE DIVISION OF LABOR

    (The flip side of “I, Pencil”.) (probably an important lesson)

    Military(organization of territory) <> Judiciary (organization of cooperation-contract) <> Finance (organization of money(stored time)) <> Entrepreneurship (Organization of opportunity, capital, people) <> Professionals (organization of production(calculation)) <> Managers (Organization of people) <> Producers (Organization of resources) <> Distributors (organization of distribution) <> Trade (organization of transactions) <> Consumers (organization of consumption) <> Parents (organization of reproduction) <> teachers, priests, public intellectuals politicians ( sedation, facilitation, and amelioration of stress arising from scarcity, individual and familial irrelevance, and alienation in the division of labor upon which they depend.)

    Given the problem of “I,Pencil” (distribution of knowledge), an individual farmer has to input a lot of diverse knowledge and effort for low return on investment, in no small part because petroleum products, industrialization, fertilizer, feed were fully commoditized.

    A farmer organizes primary resources (animals, food stuffs) and as such must be a skilled craftsman (organizers of specialized resources) at the very limit of craftsman’s capital (tools – no other craftsman requires so many tools).

    But the returns on the organization of resources are small – there are few multipliers. As you move up the production hierarchy you are responsible for organizing more and more and more people – where there are multipliers.

    This is why Marx is wrong. In order to organize people by rational incentives, one must produce marginal competitive differences by which to influence their choices.

    As such the entire difficulty in organizing production is organizing the human beings in a vast network to engage in it with nothing other than the bribe of doing the work (payment).


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 08:41:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/87045742_212213076843520_31793515466

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/87045742_212213076843520_31793515466

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/87045742_212213076843520_3179351546613727232_n_212213073510187.jpg ON FARMERS IN THE DIVISION OF LABOR

    (The flip side of “I, Pencil”.) (probably an important lesson)

    Military(organization of territory) <> Judiciary (organization of cooperation-contract) <> Finance (organization of money(stored time)) <> Entrepreneurship (Organization of opportunity, capital, people) <> Professionals (organization of production(calculation)) <> Managers (Organization of people) <> Producers (Organization of resources) <> Distributors (organization of distribution) <> Trade (organization of transactions) <> Consumers (organization of consumption) <> Parents (organization of reproduction) <> teachers, priests, public intellectuals politicians ( sedation, facilitation, and amelioration of stress arising from scarcity, individual and familial irrelevance, and alienation in the division of labor upon which they depend.)

    Given the problem of “I,Pencil” (distribution of knowledge), an individual farmer has to input a lot of diverse knowledge and effort for low return on investment, in no small part because petroleum products, industrialization, fertilizer, feed were fully commoditized, and distribution.

    A farmer organizes primary resources (animals, food stuffs) and as such must be a skilled craftsman (organizers of specialized resources) at the very limit of craftsman’s capital (tools – no other craftsman requires so many tools).

    But the returns on the organization of resources are small – there are few multipliers. As you move up the production hierarchy you are responsible for organizing more and more and more people – where there are multipliers.

    This is why Marx is wrong. In order to organize people by rational incentives, one must produce marginal competitive differences by which to influence their choices.

    As such the entire difficulty in organizing production is organizing the human beings in a vast network to engage in it with nothing other than the bribe of doing the work (payment).

    —-

    (See attached net income for farms)ON FARMERS IN THE DIVISION OF LABOR

    (The flip side of “I, Pencil”.) (probably an important lesson)

    Military(organization of territory) <> Judiciary (organization of cooperation-contract) <> Finance (organization of money(stored time)) <> Entrepreneurship (Organization of opportunity, capital, people) <> Professionals (organization of production(calculation)) <> Managers (Organization of people) <> Producers (Organization of resources) <> Distributors (organization of distribution) <> Trade (organization of transactions) <> Consumers (organization of consumption) <> Parents (organization of reproduction) <> teachers, priests, public intellectuals politicians ( sedation, facilitation, and amelioration of stress arising from scarcity, individual and familial irrelevance, and alienation in the division of labor upon which they depend.)

    Given the problem of “I,Pencil” (distribution of knowledge), an individual farmer has to input a lot of diverse knowledge and effort for low return on investment, in no small part because petroleum products, industrialization, fertilizer, feed were fully commoditized, and distribution.

    A farmer organizes primary resources (animals, food stuffs) and as such must be a skilled craftsman (organizers of specialized resources) at the very limit of craftsman’s capital (tools – no other craftsman requires so many tools).

    But the returns on the organization of resources are small – there are few multipliers. As you move up the production hierarchy you are responsible for organizing more and more and more people – where there are multipliers.

    This is why Marx is wrong. In order to organize people by rational incentives, one must produce marginal competitive differences by which to influence their choices.

    As such the entire difficulty in organizing production is organizing the human beings in a vast network to engage in it with nothing other than the bribe of doing the work (payment).

    —-

    (See attached net income for farms)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 08:41:00 UTC

  • Great question. No. Has to be in 2d space (surface) to qualify as rent-seeking.

    Great question. No. Has to be in 2d space (surface) to qualify as rent-seeking. No interference underground. (Or above really).


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-17 01:59:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229223763436359680

    Reply addressees: @MartianHoplite

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229222893172789249

  • Economics (in the Beckerian tradition) should be required to get any degree and

    Economics (in the Beckerian tradition) should be required to get any degree and any pretense of conception of what ‘ethics’ means.

    People like you are a cancer for mankind.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 17:26:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229094784603754506

    Reply addressees: @drjulie_b

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229094516377997312


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @drjulie_b So go read bio-ethics yourself. Not propaganda. Not marxist, feminist, postmodernist pseudoscience and sophistry.

    What is the human cost of reversing thousands of years of soft eugenics by taxation and credit expansion in the middle to profit the top and expand the bottom?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1229094516377997312

  • “Why complicate everything? Just get rid of usury and that makes more difference

    —“Why complicate everything? Just get rid of usury and that makes more difference than anything else will ever do. Capitalism/Socialism/Communism/Democracy are not antithesis – they are all infected with the same virus.”—Ian Beveridge

    Because the enemy never gives up on the pursuit of crimes – so we need a market for the prosecution of crimes, by a methodology that prohibits even attempts at crime.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-16 12:14:00 UTC

  • It is very hard to make your first million. It is very easy to make every additi

    It is very hard to make your first million. It is very easy to make every additional million.

    After you have enough money saved that you can survive for one year without income you will feel very different about life – because everything left is now your choice.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-15 02:41:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228509540699820032

    Reply addressees: @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228333484143497216

  • Expressed in Value Neutral Economic Terms

    Expressed in Value Neutral Economic Terms https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/14/expressed-in-value-neutral-economic-terms/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 15:36:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228342253376229378