Tweak: Not suggesting a countersignal, but the people also have an interest in preventing crypto that serves criminal interests. But that is the only interest our insurers of last resort (states) do have in the matter. Ergo absolutes vs qualified absolutes.
IMO if trump is elected, prevents CDBC, and has the treasury hold BTC, then the game is over and crypto wins. It both means we have an insurer of last resort for BTC, and it means we have an asset that is globally recognized and free of dilution.
I have specific social interests: solving the banklessness problem and check cashing problems for the little folk, the escrow problem, the clearing problem, the international transfer problem, and in general the fact that banks are all but unnecessary other than for accepting cash deposits and cash distributions.
Reply addressees: @Narodism
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-06 20:49:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820925209697759232
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820902797342339296