Category: Economics, Finance, and Political Economy

  • No. Gold Isn’t Money any Longer

    May 3, 2020, 11:32 AM

    —“GOLD IS MONEY!”–

    No. You are confusing unperishability, collateral, commodity, and money. If gold was money it would not be priced in currency (which is liquid). It’s illiquid and volatile for the purpose of commerce and trade – particularly in imputation of prices and organizing production cycles – and that is why it’s not money: the transaction costs are ridiculous. And that’s why gold bugs want to sell it: to profit from the transaction costs of selling a commodity that is barely consumable but universally valuable by virtue of it’s demand, scarcity, unperishability, by false promise, fear, and doubt to suckers who feel out of control of their lives and the societies and their polities, and are desperate for psychological sedation by some sense of security – despite the fact that between purchase price and sale costs, they lose at least ten percent of its value, and the vaunted collapse never comes – because it can’t come under fiat currency targeted to maintaining price-inflation stability. Which is why we use fiat currency instead of gold: (a) we can maintain stability, (b) which increases the duration of the hierarchy and network of complex production cycles, (c) which decreases costs, and (d) continuously expands the sustainable networks of production and trade. (e) and gold isn’t insurable on deposit, and can’t be used as credit money in fractional reserve, so the price of credit would skyrocket. Gold is free to circulate. People don’t do it because THERE ISN’T ENOUGH OF IT. It’s possible to use gold as a backing for a physical currency money, but not for credit money. Almost every cent in circulation is credit money not money. So, the way we solve this problem is the way we do today: buy silver and gold as a hedge against volatility in the currency and use currency as a hedge against the volatility of the precious metals.

  • No. Gold Isn’t Money any Longer

    May 3, 2020, 11:32 AM

    —“GOLD IS MONEY!”–

    No. You are confusing unperishability, collateral, commodity, and money. If gold was money it would not be priced in currency (which is liquid). It’s illiquid and volatile for the purpose of commerce and trade – particularly in imputation of prices and organizing production cycles – and that is why it’s not money: the transaction costs are ridiculous. And that’s why gold bugs want to sell it: to profit from the transaction costs of selling a commodity that is barely consumable but universally valuable by virtue of it’s demand, scarcity, unperishability, by false promise, fear, and doubt to suckers who feel out of control of their lives and the societies and their polities, and are desperate for psychological sedation by some sense of security – despite the fact that between purchase price and sale costs, they lose at least ten percent of its value, and the vaunted collapse never comes – because it can’t come under fiat currency targeted to maintaining price-inflation stability. Which is why we use fiat currency instead of gold: (a) we can maintain stability, (b) which increases the duration of the hierarchy and network of complex production cycles, (c) which decreases costs, and (d) continuously expands the sustainable networks of production and trade. (e) and gold isn’t insurable on deposit, and can’t be used as credit money in fractional reserve, so the price of credit would skyrocket. Gold is free to circulate. People don’t do it because THERE ISN’T ENOUGH OF IT. It’s possible to use gold as a backing for a physical currency money, but not for credit money. Almost every cent in circulation is credit money not money. So, the way we solve this problem is the way we do today: buy silver and gold as a hedge against volatility in the currency and use currency as a hedge against the volatility of the precious metals.

  • Division is good. Division creates competition. Competition creates innovation.

    Division is good. Division creates competition. Competition creates innovation. Innovation creates prosperity.

    Why do you think China STAGNATED. (1) failure to develop science of politics and law (2) ceremonial rather than empirical bureaucracy, (3) hostility to middle class.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 13:17:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259110149681303554

    Reply addressees: @sukimoji

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259108957903187968

  • You cannot live without imports, you would die by the millions

    You cannot live without imports, you would die by the millions.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 12:14:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259094460258037760

    Reply addressees: @HaiTaoYang9 @ZhiYeC

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259093869603377153

  • You are not self reliant on food or energy, and in particular energy. And you ha

    You are not self reliant on food or energy, and in particular energy. And you have an export economy dependent on the protection of the american navy. This is why leadership made ‘belt and road’ and ‘stole’ islands in south china sea: because shipping is why china is vulnerable.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 12:11:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259093625067143168

    Reply addressees: @HaiTaoYang9 @ZhiYeC

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259093154352914432

  • The only value of scale is (a) military expansion (b) trade policy and (c) borro

    The only value of scale is (a) military expansion (b) trade policy and (c) borrowing capacity. Given fiat currency, India, China, the USA, and France’s attempt at converting the EU in to a french empire (despite its history as the german HRE) are past the point of utility.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 01:37:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1258934149534167040

    Reply addressees: @dreadpiratepsl

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1258933283989094401


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @dreadpiratepsl So central states excel at investment in ‘catching up’ or ‘standardization’ or ‘reduction of frictions’ and must migrate to strategic private partnership and private operation because private sector suppresses corruption, produces higher returns on capital, and adapts rapidly.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1258933283989094401

  • So central states excel at investment in ‘catching up’ or ‘standardization’ or ‘

    So central states excel at investment in ‘catching up’ or ‘standardization’ or ‘reduction of frictions’ and must migrate to strategic private partnership and private operation because private sector suppresses corruption, produces higher returns on capital, and adapts rapidly.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 01:34:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1258933283989094401

    Reply addressees: @dreadpiratepsl

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1258932851690606593


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @dreadpiratepsl Corps, Govts, States, and Empires excel at imposing standards and suppressing local rents (and transaction costs), producing economic velocity until central rents are maximized and the political system is unable to adapt to shocks, trade route changes, or population pressures.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1258932851690606593

  • Corps, Govts, States, and Empires excel at imposing standards and suppressing lo

    Corps, Govts, States, and Empires excel at imposing standards and suppressing local rents (and transaction costs), producing economic velocity until central rents are maximized and the political system is unable to adapt to shocks, trade route changes, or population pressures.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 01:32:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1258932851690606593

    Reply addressees: @dreadpiratepsl

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1258932220858961920


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @dreadpiratepsl Same as everyone else: rule over heterogeneous polities.

    British/HRE: Country > Nation(Ethnic) > Nation State > Federation (Kin)
    French/Russian: Country > Culture(Ethnic) > State > Empire (Corporate)
    Chinese/Islamic: Population(Ethnic) > Province/Region/etc > Empire (Martial)

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1258932220858961920

  • Proles don’t taste very good. You can’t even eat them. And now they don’t even m

    Proles don’t taste very good. You can’t even eat them. And now they don’t even make good serfs or slaves. Machines are better.

    “Better to decrease the surplus population.”


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 00:09:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1258911832489840645

    Reply addressees: @ProleLumpen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1258868935761391616

  • (Imagine what would happen if we kept credit ratings, but ended debt collection.

    (Imagine what would happen if we kept credit ratings, but ended debt collection. We might not have to do anything else.)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-07 12:14:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1258369739505586176

    Reply addressees: @YvesBurri @EricLiford @Nationalist7346

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1258369025073127425


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @YvesBurri @EricLiford @Nationalist7346 P increases the scope of the law to cover both false promise, and baiting into hazard, at contractual ( private contracts ) and political ( contracts of the commons ) scales. This is the weakness in the current law.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1258369025073127425