Curt Doolittle

Category: Economics, Finance, and Political Economy

  • Cancer Is Successful Too. Let’s Judge Success by The Creation of Capital.

    Jan 29, 2020, 10:58 AM

    —“Hard to say the Islam isn’t successful. It’s been around a long time and is constantly expanding. Do I want their version of success? No but I can’t deny their system works.”— Greg Hamilton

    By that measure cancer is successful. Same thing. Islam and cancer. Capital creation or destruction? Islam is the single greatest destroyer of genetic, human, civilizational, cultural, informational, intellectual, scientific, technological, artistic capital in human history. And is second only to the great plague in producing dead. Judaism > Christianity > Islam: if there is a devil, the abrahamic religion and the abrahamic method of false promise baiting into hazard is certainly his creed. Abrahamic Judaism in jewish, christian, islamic, or marxist, postmodernist, feminist, denialist form is the greatest calamity in human history. It’s thousands of times worse than the British Opium trade, or the jewish selling of alcohol and prostitution on credit to eastern europeans, or the jewish usury of 300% on agrarian credit. Or the spread of Syphilis from the new world to the old, or the spread of disease from the old world to the new. Or the spread of black plague from Asia to Europe. There is no comparison to the cancer of judaism, christianity, and islam – even if christianity was miraculously domesticated by the europeans into compatibility with our traditional natural law. Judaism to undermine, Christianity to pacify, and islam to conquer.

  • Cancer Is Successful Too. Let’s Judge Success by The Creation of Capital.

    Jan 29, 2020, 10:58 AM

    —“Hard to say the Islam isn’t successful. It’s been around a long time and is constantly expanding. Do I want their version of success? No but I can’t deny their system works.”— Greg Hamilton

    By that measure cancer is successful. Same thing. Islam and cancer. Capital creation or destruction? Islam is the single greatest destroyer of genetic, human, civilizational, cultural, informational, intellectual, scientific, technological, artistic capital in human history. And is second only to the great plague in producing dead. Judaism > Christianity > Islam: if there is a devil, the abrahamic religion and the abrahamic method of false promise baiting into hazard is certainly his creed. Abrahamic Judaism in jewish, christian, islamic, or marxist, postmodernist, feminist, denialist form is the greatest calamity in human history. It’s thousands of times worse than the British Opium trade, or the jewish selling of alcohol and prostitution on credit to eastern europeans, or the jewish usury of 300% on agrarian credit. Or the spread of Syphilis from the new world to the old, or the spread of disease from the old world to the new. Or the spread of black plague from Asia to Europe. There is no comparison to the cancer of judaism, christianity, and islam – even if christianity was miraculously domesticated by the europeans into compatibility with our traditional natural law. Judaism to undermine, Christianity to pacify, and islam to conquer.

  • Governments Do Have Currency if Not Money

    Feb 1, 2020, 5:40 PM

    —“Governments don’t have money, citizens do. Will the state fund [whatever] through mandatory force derived taxes or will state funding be purely voluntary on the part of interested citizens (non mandatory tithing).”—

    Hmmm… that’s not entirely true. Just as a thought experiment, assume a government over a territory that is fully autarkic and has no need of foreign currency or trade. This government can issue a currency (each unit a tradable share in the economy), demand it as legal tender for all debts private and public, and it can equidistribute X amount of this currency to every citizen every day, week, month, quarter, year or whatever directly to a bank account. It can then collect some percentage of that in taxes and repeat the process. This is what governments already do. They just put the banks in the middle requiring us to borrow it and giving the banks interest, thereby having the banks inflate 9x times the amount. We are not fully autarkic so the process limits the state’s powers of monetary distribution. Modern monetary theory won’t work, but this will, it will just require collecting and measuring better information than we do now

  • Governments Do Have Currency if Not Money

    Feb 1, 2020, 5:40 PM

    —“Governments don’t have money, citizens do. Will the state fund [whatever] through mandatory force derived taxes or will state funding be purely voluntary on the part of interested citizens (non mandatory tithing).”—

    Hmmm… that’s not entirely true. Just as a thought experiment, assume a government over a territory that is fully autarkic and has no need of foreign currency or trade. This government can issue a currency (each unit a tradable share in the economy), demand it as legal tender for all debts private and public, and it can equidistribute X amount of this currency to every citizen every day, week, month, quarter, year or whatever directly to a bank account. It can then collect some percentage of that in taxes and repeat the process. This is what governments already do. They just put the banks in the middle requiring us to borrow it and giving the banks interest, thereby having the banks inflate 9x times the amount. We are not fully autarkic so the process limits the state’s powers of monetary distribution. Modern monetary theory won’t work, but this will, it will just require collecting and measuring better information than we do now

  • Production of What?

    Feb 6, 2020, 7:34 AM Commons, Goods, Services, Information, and Incentives. The problem demarcation between scientists that supply information and ‘intellectuals’ that provide incentives unbound by science: truth and reciprocity. |PRODUCTION| Commons > Consumption: Goods > Services > Information > Incentives Are there any good intellectuals? Or are they all priests selling false promise baiting the people into hazard?

  • Production of What?

    Feb 6, 2020, 7:34 AM Commons, Goods, Services, Information, and Incentives. The problem demarcation between scientists that supply information and ‘intellectuals’ that provide incentives unbound by science: truth and reciprocity. |PRODUCTION| Commons > Consumption: Goods > Services > Information > Incentives Are there any good intellectuals? Or are they all priests selling false promise baiting the people into hazard?

  • The Financial Systems of The World Will Resist Us

    Feb 11, 2020, 11:11 AM

    —“Accounting for changes in genetic, institutional, cultural and normative capital would not go over well with Capital (the societal force) as it is currently conceived of. Japan is a good example of where they DO take the balance sheet into consideration.”—Michael Churchill

  • The Financial Systems of The World Will Resist Us

    Feb 11, 2020, 11:11 AM

    —“Accounting for changes in genetic, institutional, cultural and normative capital would not go over well with Capital (the societal force) as it is currently conceived of. Japan is a good example of where they DO take the balance sheet into consideration.”—Michael Churchill

  • The Full Circle of Currency

    Feb 24, 2020, 10:49 AM

    • by Bill Joslin –

    From what i understand currency pertained to debt tracking before it was used for trade. (in group tally of debts within small communities that distributed resources and only engaged in formal trade across groups)(greaber’s Debt) (oddly we’ve come full circle with currency created when debts are issued) -by Paul Franklin – Coinage, then, might have been an attempt to create professional armies to avoid paying them through plunder? Philanthropic. Paper money, according to Ezra Pound, was ‘philanthropic’ invention of a Chinese Emperor in a drought, issued to the starving illiterate peasants that they might buy enough of the grain they grew from the Barons who kept it, and not die. The barons redeem the paper for the promise of gold declared for their presentation before the Emperor. Promise? Is this the same post? One message I have for Christians, one thing that I can tell you with the same certainty I can predict tomorrow’s sunrise will occur – Christ is definitely not coming. No point in waiting for that promise to be fulfilled. Although the implication is therefore that he must already be here?

  • The Full Circle of Currency

    Feb 24, 2020, 10:49 AM

    • by Bill Joslin –

    From what i understand currency pertained to debt tracking before it was used for trade. (in group tally of debts within small communities that distributed resources and only engaged in formal trade across groups)(greaber’s Debt) (oddly we’ve come full circle with currency created when debts are issued) -by Paul Franklin – Coinage, then, might have been an attempt to create professional armies to avoid paying them through plunder? Philanthropic. Paper money, according to Ezra Pound, was ‘philanthropic’ invention of a Chinese Emperor in a drought, issued to the starving illiterate peasants that they might buy enough of the grain they grew from the Barons who kept it, and not die. The barons redeem the paper for the promise of gold declared for their presentation before the Emperor. Promise? Is this the same post? One message I have for Christians, one thing that I can tell you with the same certainty I can predict tomorrow’s sunrise will occur – Christ is definitely not coming. No point in waiting for that promise to be fulfilled. Although the implication is therefore that he must already be here?