RT @JadeBai85455803: @2count2 @curtdoolittle So no, not distribution, and there’s way less tax.
You can try to poke holes all you want bu…
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-28 19:45:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277327350821203969
are you saying a flat tax isn’t unfair to the poorest people? Or that by having a flat tax with subsidy for the poor is not the least progressive tax with the fewest malincentives?
Reply addressees: @2count2 @Bantz_Rayder
are you saying a flat tax isn’t unfair to the poorest people? Or that by having a flat tax with subsidy for the poor is not the least progressive tax with the fewest malincentives?
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-28 19:11:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277318829866192899
Reply addressees: @2count2 @Bantz_Rayder
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277317394386599937
It comes from taxation (Flat 18/19%, Flat Sales) subsidized at time of purchase to retain progressive taxation, and the nationalization of the returns on strategic investment (chinese model of investment). This prohibits rent seeking, and requires interest on productivity.
Reply addressees: @2count2 @JadeBai85455803
It comes from taxation (Flat 18/19%, Flat Sales) subsidized at time of purchase to retain progressive taxation, and the nationalization of the returns on strategic investment (chinese model of investment). This prohibits rent seeking, and requires interest on productivity.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-28 16:44:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277281841398120448
Reply addressees: @2count2 @JadeBai85455803
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277276765459812355
Now it should be restored. The reason it was removed was beacause it was providing cheap labor and competition.
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski
Now it should be restored. The reason it was removed was beacause it was providing cheap labor and competition.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-28 01:14:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277047621157302278
Reply addressees: @JulieBorowski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277044047027277825
Externalities are where getting her into the biz, or her conducting the biz, can create liability. But basically, online, in person, not in public – nope.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-27 23:58:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277028585581219845
Reply addressees: @WinstonSmith767
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1277028325396025344
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@WinstonSmith767 Reciprocity: Productive, Fully Informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Exchange, Free of Imposition of Costs Upon Others By Externality.Where warrantied requires due diligence against all including baiting into hazard. Getting her into biz is a crime. Public display is. Transaction not.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1277028325396025344
Externalities are where getting her into the biz, or her conducting the biz, can create liability. But basically, online, in person, not in public – nope.
Reply addressees: @WinstonSmith767
No. We will make it collapse – somewhat – but on our terms. And no ,you don’t want a gold based anything, nor a crypto and you’d have to be pretty ignorant of economics to even suggest it. Libertarians were as wrong about everything as marxists for the same reasons.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-24 21:21:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1275901851448291328
Reply addressees: @AndrewAnalytics
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1275895052640845824