didn’t really think of that route. I think the economics on their end are so fearful taht they wouldn’t do it. But that woud be the righ vector.
Maybe I will just write up the whole thing, let the public have it and see what happens.
Reply addressees: @Frank_Lee_White @MeisterDutch
Category: Economics, Finance, and Political Economy
-
didn’t really think of that route. I think the economics on their end are so fea
-
didn’t really think of that route. I think the economics on their end are so fea
didn’t really think of that route. I think the economics on their end are so fearful taht they wouldn’t do it. But that woud be the righ vector.
Maybe I will just write up the whole thing, let the public have it and see what happens.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-10 01:06:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1281394229282045952
Reply addressees: @Frank_Lee_White @MeisterDutch
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1281393858647953408
-
The fed thing is wrong but at least it’s rational. 😉 Damn
The fed thing is wrong but at least it’s rational. 😉 Damn.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-09 21:45:00 UTC
-
Then we put forth the greatest economic restructuring since the roman reforms, t
Then we put forth the greatest economic restructuring since the roman reforms, this time reallocating the financial sector to the laboring and middle classes as restitution for the harms of the financial sector. Then we reform benefits, and education, and academy.
Reply addressees: @cpicciolini @jjmacnab @egavactip -
Then we put forth the greatest economic restructuring since the roman reforms, t
Then we put forth the greatest economic restructuring since the roman reforms, this time reallocating the financial sector to the laboring and middle classes as restitution for the harms of the financial sector. Then we reform benefits, and education, and academy.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-08 21:56:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1280984028603170818
Reply addressees: @cpicciolini @jjmacnab @egavactip
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1278801577717964800
-
It will also all but destroy the stock market with a frictionless, fee-less syst
It will also all but destroy the stock market with a frictionless, fee-less system. Which I like even more. 😉
Reply addressees: @h0b0spic3s @Manse111 -
It will also all but destroy the stock market with a frictionless, fee-less syst
It will also all but destroy the stock market with a frictionless, fee-less system. Which I like even more. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-02 17:04:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1278736424821501952
Reply addressees: @h0b0spic3s @Manse111
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1278735931902656513
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@h0b0spic3s @Manse111 So (a) end proof of work, making ordinary monolithic transaction systems like banking today, (b) limit the minimum fractional value of a share before ‘writing down’.(c) allow rolling up of fractions into new shares.
I mean it’s fantastic.Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1278735931902656513
-
Moreover, I and others have proposed all accounting systems be modified to this
Moreover, I and others have proposed all accounting systems be modified to this technique so that moneysubsitutes can be tracked throughout the full lifecycle, providing the accounting information we lack to undestand the state of economies.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-02 17:01:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1278735538028232704
Reply addressees: @h0b0spic3s @Manse111
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1278735229948170241
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@h0b0spic3s @Manse111 Don’t misinterpret me. I’ve said the same thing continuously since at least ’14: the technology converted from proof or work, to monolithic transactions will allow the development of a perfect currency, and use of interset in ALL ASSETS as a medium of exchange.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1278735229948170241
-
Moreover, I and others have proposed all accounting systems be modified to this
Moreover, I and others have proposed all accounting systems be modified to this technique so that moneysubsitutes can be tracked throughout the full lifecycle, providing the accounting information we lack to undestand the state of economies.
Reply addressees: @h0b0spic3s @Manse111 -
The ledger makes possible fractional shares, which is the logical step in the ev
The ledger makes possible fractional shares, which is the logical step in the evolution of fiat currency, corporate shares, shares in debt, etc. And cuts out the middle man. The idea that it is going to insulate us from the government is a dream for children. Never happen.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-02 16:20:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1278725350080614401
Reply addressees: @h0b0spic3s @Manse111
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1278724937067487236
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@h0b0spic3s @Manse111 I’ll tell you something unpopular: I don’t really think much of the blockchain technology for the simple reason that proof of work is an uneconomic means of solving what is better solved by simply paying for the upfront cost of transactional technology that does the same thing.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1278724937067487236