All those high-income jobs with technical competency now forced into high overhead cost buildings in high-cost cities that only benefit the financial class, no longer make sense. They don’t make sense for biz or people, and without facilities, you don’t need any labor. City=slum.
Category: Economics, Finance, and Political Economy
-
All those high-income jobs with technical competency now forced into high overhe
All those high-income jobs with technical competency now forced into high overhead cost buildings in high-cost cities that only benefit the financial class, no longer make sense. They don’t make sense for biz or people, and without facilities, you don’t need any labor. City=slum.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-28 16:51:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288155120392450053
-
I mean, try to understand that density decreases opportunity costs, at the cost
I mean, try to understand that density decreases opportunity costs, at the cost of higher material costs. Just like manufacturing plants did for labor. Or plantations for farm labor. But there is no longer value in paying high urban costs to access opportunity. So? Middle flees.
-
I mean, try to understand that density decreases opportunity costs, at the cost
I mean, try to understand that density decreases opportunity costs, at the cost of higher material costs. Just like manufacturing plants did for labor. Or plantations for farm labor. But there is no longer value in paying high urban costs to access opportunity. So? Middle flees.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-28 16:49:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288154608070791170
-
Yes, but who lives there now? The top in the center and the bottom in a ring of
Yes, but who lives there now? The top in the center and the bottom in a ring of slums around it, and the middle in exurbia, suburbia, or the rural areas. What will happen to the minority of the middle that isn’t happening in response to COVID? Proximity at Cost, lost its value.
Reply addressees: @Elbanna201 -
Yes, but who lives there now? The top in the center and the bottom in a ring of
Yes, but who lives there now? The top in the center and the bottom in a ring of slums around it, and the middle in exurbia, suburbia, or the rural areas. What will happen to the minority of the middle that isn’t happening in response to COVID? Proximity at Cost, lost its value.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-28 16:45:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288153679837696002
Reply addressees: @Elbanna201
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288132938274672641
-
Communism is impossible. capitalism is impossible. Mixed economy state capitalis
Communism is impossible. capitalism is impossible. Mixed economy state capitalism is the historical and necessarily competitive norm. Rule of law or reciprocity with universal standing solves the problem of mixed economy state capitalism, by providing a market for policing it.
Reply addressees: @Coronakrise5 -
Communism is impossible. capitalism is impossible. Mixed economy state capitalis
Communism is impossible. capitalism is impossible. Mixed economy state capitalism is the historical and necessarily competitive norm. Rule of law or reciprocity with universal standing solves the problem of mixed economy state capitalism, by providing a market for policing it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 16:51:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286705604317392896
Reply addressees: @Coronakrise5
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286704991143698433
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Coronakrise5 Rome invented good Govt. China good bureaucratic. France restored it in National Socialism. Germany practiced it. Now China does. This form of government is the world-historical norm. Ideology separates bad from good. “Hurt” states practice hostile ideology. ‘Ideology makes bad’.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1286704991143698433
-
THE FACTORS OF CHINESE ECONOMIC GROWTH – AND CHINA ISN’T COMMUNIST – IT’S NAZI –
THE FACTORS OF CHINESE ECONOMIC GROWTH – AND CHINA ISN’T COMMUNIST – IT’S NAZI
—“CURT: What are the factors of economic growth in China as a communist country?”—
1) They have a devoted, nationalistic, (chip on the shoulder) red army, convinced of ethnic and cultural superiority, and china’s destiny to return to its traditional position as ‘the center of the world’ that can force implementation of policy.
2) They have an authoritarian government, running the empire as a business, that’s backed by that army that can force policy
3) They have a very long tradition of professional bureaucracy and ‘grow’ leadership by the gradual promotion of those who are successful at local levels to increasing degrees of responsibility.
4) They have a vast labor pool – the only cheap labor pool with a +100 IQ – meaning the most industrializable pool of poor remaining in the world.
5) They use intelligence (Spies), their international students and citizens as spies and thieves, and conduct outright thefts, by every means possible to obtain technology and use their cheap labor and technology to slowly take over world industrial production (just as the USA did to Europe in the (1800’s), and how Americans and Russians stole and took advantage of german technology postwar.
6) They use the invention of Regan era American financial credit system (digital money) to make all these investments so that they didn’t have to use the communist model of forced labor in order to afford it – and therefore avoided the communist-socialist problem of ‘incentives and impossibility of economic calculation’.
HOWEVER
China is a Fascist, not a communist country. We can’t face this painful truth yet, but the Chinese didn’t copy the communists – they aren’t a communist government. Instead, they copied the Nazis – they are a Fascist Government.
Fascism: Nationalist, Racist, Autarkic, Mixed Economy, Opposition to Jewish Cosmopolitanism (one-world government principles, subjugating all, depriving people of sovereignty, and self-determination). And opposition to American Meritocracy, Democracy – the failed project to spread democracy beyond northern European peoples who are uniquely able to practice it because of genetics and culture and institutions.
And what the Chinese have done, as the Germans did, is prove that Fascism, not democracy, not social democracy, not communism, won the war of political models of the 19th and 20th Centuries.
Why? Because (a) intolerance for political competition, (good), (b) ethnocentrism (racism), (c) desperate attempt to maintain legitimacy by keeping the people happy, (good), (d) using debt (state capitalism) instead of forced labor (state socialism), (good), (e) creating an economy rather than a military (good), (f) using that economy to build the world’s dominant military (good). (g) so that they can replace the USA’s dollar as a reserve currency (good), and become the dominant power in the world (i dunno if that’s good).
China isn’t communist. It’s Nazi.
And just as the Nazis would have without the entirety of the developed world going to war with them – they are going to win.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-23 12:05:00 UTC
-
We just outlined the debate. I’ve engaged your points. Nothing can compensate fo
We just outlined the debate. I’ve engaged your points. Nothing can compensate for the failure of forced labor economies to produce continuously declining production, and continuously increasing corruption that creates negates initial advantage.
Reply addressees: @PunishedSkelet4