Silly. That’s what ALL human organizations do, of all sales, and there is no alternative to suppression of rents other than that which we recommend.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-16 17:20:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868707862551445654
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868706201888080111
😉 Operationalize the definition of distributism for those who don’t know of it.
IMO can happen with proceeds but cannot happen otherwise, given that the competency of the population follows the power law (Pareto distribution) and the average nitwit has no idea of the degree of competency required for the management of productivity at scale.
The average person when questioned on anything outside of his (and especially hers) direct hands-on experience is an imbecile – indistinguishable from madness.
Reply addressees: @DistributistLaw
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-16 17:19:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868707500025167877
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868705242021609936
Corollary in Politics: “Once you convert from productivity to rent seeking, rent seeking is so rewarding that you keep going until you run out of possible rents.” https://twitter.com/Hail__To_You/status/1868597028684767346
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-16 17:00:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868702856628604956
Corollary in Politics: “Once you convert from productivity to rent seeking, rent seeking is so rewarding that you keep going until you run out of possible rents.”
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-16 17:00:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868702856569929733
It is one first principle (demand) it is not the limiting principle that constrains it (supply). Again, failing to see how you can’t or won’t gasp what is fairly obvious.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-15 21:05:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868402126101336087
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868393649698214143
The broad category as used in economics is ‘rent seeking’.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-15 00:35:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868092484909470204
Reply addressees: @Plinz
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868091188462682142
The broad category as used in economics is ‘rent seeking’.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-15 00:35:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1868092484863336448
People will respond to markets. The “broken boys” of the right are a very bad market.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-13 18:51:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867643475426259264
Reply addressees: @pundasdad @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1867642688218050917
IMO: BTC down to 95 is just profit taking and EOY.
150k in 2025 is more likely than not.
I’m not a crypto-bro. Just looking at the macro environment.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-10 19:03:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866559352565547416
Agreed. Ergo. There is always a mixed economy. There is always the choice between army (nationalism) and navy (internationalism). One need only choose. And choose what imposes no costs upon neighbors sufficient to incentivize them to war.
Source date (UTC): 2024-12-09 18:08:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866183259396461046
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1866179413076820256