RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle The increase has been indirect.
Where direct wealth increases it supports greater agency/autonomy, the…
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-22 22:35:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1407467336269971459
RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle The increase has been indirect.
Where direct wealth increases it supports greater agency/autonomy, the…
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-22 22:35:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1407467336269971459
–“How can a government, that’s $28 trillion in debt, spend trillions of dollars that it does not have? Well, one major way is the Federal Reserve creates money-out-of-thin-air and then ‘loans’ it to the government by buying the government’s bonds.”– Ron Paul
RON: Serious Questions: 1) What right do savers have to the preservation of the purchasing power of a fiat currency? 2) What right do lenders have to the preservation of the purchasing power of debt+interest? If these gains are obtained at the expense of supply. AFAIK, none. 4) Why does anyone have a right to produce an artificial scarcity? 5) the only answer to this question is: … a) contractual frictions created for business velocity (production cycles), … and; … b) friction on the ability to save for retirement. So 6) Is (a) true? And can (b) be solved? Science not philosophy, ideology, or sophistry.
–“How can a government, that’s $28 trillion in debt, spend trillions of dollars that it does not have? Well, one major way is the Federal Reserve creates money-out-of-thin-air and then ‘loans’ it to the government by buying the government’s bonds.”– Ron Paul
RON: Serious Questions: 1) What right do savers have to the preservation of the purchasing power of a fiat currency? 2) What right do lenders have to the preservation of the purchasing power of debt+interest? If these gains are obtained at the expense of supply. AFAIK, none. 4) Why does anyone have a right to produce an artificial scarcity? 5) the only answer to this question is: … a) contractual frictions created for business velocity (production cycles), … and; … b) friction on the ability to save for retirement. So 6) Is (a) true? And can (b) be solved? Science not philosophy, ideology, or sophistry.
END JEWISH LIBERTARIANISM:
— “How can a government, that’s $28 trillion in debt, spend trillions of dollars that it does not have? Well, one major way is the Federal Reserve creates money-out-of-thin-air and then ‘loans’ it to the government by buying the government’s bonds.” — Ron Paul
RON: Serious Questions:
1) What right do savers have to the preservation of the purchasing power of a fiat currency?
2) What right do lenders have to the preservation of the purchasing power of debt+interest?
If these gains are obtained at the expense of supply?
AFAIK, none.
4) Why does anyone have a right to produce an artificial scarcity?
5) the only answer to this question is:
… a) contractual frictions created for business velocity (production cycles), and;
… b) friction on the ability to save for retirement.
6) So, is (a) true? And can (b) be solved?
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-20 19:18:00 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106444664370106605
4) Why does anyone have a right to produce an artificial scarcity? 5) the only answer to this question is a) contractual frictions created for business velocity (production cycles), and b) friction on the ability to save for retirement. So 6) Is (a) true? And can (b) be solved? https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1406664524829237257
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-20 17:28:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1406665172018733059
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1406664524829237257
RON: Serious Questions: 1) What right do savers have to the preservation of the purchasing power of a fiat currency? 2) What right do lenders have to the preservation of the purchasing power of debt+interest? 3) If these gains are obtained at the expense of supply?
AFAIK, none.
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-20 17:25:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1406664524829237257
Reply addressees: @RonPaul
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1406291267470999552
It’s relatively easy to create a spectrum of economies: slave(prisoner), serf(supported), freeman(self-supporting), and citizen(self-supporting, and responsible for capital), and sovereign( self-supporting, responsible for capital, responsible for rule). It’s the historical norm. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1405895174140616709
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-18 14:34:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1405896663001141251
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1405895174140616709
The difference between conservative poor(right) and consumptive poor (left), is that conservatives expect to indirectly benefit from their contribution to the production of commons, while the consumptive expect to benefit by direct consumption of others’ production.
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-18 14:31:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1405896014775652352
Anglo-Germanic (Puritanical) economics is redistributive into commons that can be shared but not consumed, thereby reducing the need for individual production and isolated consumption. This is why europeans aren’t individualistic, but self determinant, w/ status from the commons.
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-17 15:00:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1405540742001401863
Reply addressees: @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1405540389348462608
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@DegenRolf Rolph: a) all behavior can be expressed as acquisition, retention, or consumption. b) Puritanical behavior suppresses consumption, increases production, and directs the proceeds of production TO COMMONS. c) Commons reduce individual cost of consumption.
That’s Anglo Economics.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1405540389348462608
2) … in exchange for sex, children, and care. Otherwise, they aren’t ok, and men must logically privatize taxes, and direct them to their own care, consumption, retirement, and unemployment now that women make up the majority of workers and fail at replacement reproduction.
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-15 18:56:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1404875562167025666
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1404875561084796932
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
1) Statistically speaking, women are hyperconsumptive and parasitic on males, and hypergamous both sexually and politically(defectors), spend of 70% of income, and consume 70% of taxes with males the only net tax contributors. Now this might be ok if these costs are borne …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1404875561084796932