BOB (all), Why is Bob, and his criticism of mainstream pseudoscience (mathiness, logic) less influential than we’d expect? Because no criminal gives up his crimes, nor immoralist his immorality, nor liar his lies, nor parasite its host without greater incentive to do so than not.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-23 13:31:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451904200368181249
Reply addressees: @BobMurphyEcon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451901675237777412
1) OK, so reductive economic explanation of the dating market is an expansion of the tv-advertising expansion of the middle class market, both of which are funded by debt expansion not by eugenic reproduction, scientific, technological and economic discovery and innovation.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-21 16:16:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451220930915704837
THEFT: All false pretenses of equality, end of scarcity, human nature and malleability, accumulated genetic load and natural selection, are attempts to evade VOLUNTARY EXCHANGE and to evade limiting insurance to charity in exchange for conformity: doing no harm to commons. The European (Germanic > English > British > American) reason for equality (equity) under the law (natural, common, empirical law, of dispute resolution, under individual sovereignty), is to drive us into peaceful voluntary cooperation DESPITE INESCAPABLE INEQUALITY. Women destroy all attempts at capitalization in order to hyperconsume. All behavior is reducible to expressions of discovery, acquisition, retention, consumption, or trade of calories. That’s the underlying algorithm. Cooperation merely helps us obtain retain consume calories. So we live within the limits of preservation of cooperation. I’m on the verge of addressing the female need for hyperconsumption, attention, validation, and hypergamy, seduction, and irresponsibility as necessary for suppression as is male dominance expression. Again, we must simply restore equal suppression of anti-social behavior. I should also talk about the difference between the complaining by the manosphere, the flawless EXPLANATION provided by James Lindsay, and my scientific explanation. As I’ve said, we must provide religious, literary, legal, and scientific frames of understanding to win, because the enemy has attacked all our institutions of cultural production.
THEFT: All false pretenses of equality, end of scarcity, human nature and malleability, accumulated genetic load and natural selection, are attempts to evade VOLUNTARY EXCHANGE and to evade limiting insurance to charity in exchange for conformity: doing no harm to commons. The European (Germanic > English > British > American) reason for equality (equity) under the law (natural, common, empirical law, of dispute resolution, under individual sovereignty), is to drive us into peaceful voluntary cooperation DESPITE INESCAPABLE INEQUALITY. Women destroy all attempts at capitalization in order to hyperconsume. All behavior is reducible to expressions of discovery, acquisition, retention, consumption, or trade of calories. That’s the underlying algorithm. Cooperation merely helps us obtain retain consume calories. So we live within the limits of preservation of cooperation. I’m on the verge of addressing the female need for hyperconsumption, attention, validation, and hypergamy, seduction, and irresponsibility as necessary for suppression as is male dominance expression. Again, we must simply restore equal suppression of anti-social behavior. I should also talk about the difference between the complaining by the manosphere, the flawless EXPLANATION provided by James Lindsay, and my scientific explanation. As I’ve said, we must provide religious, literary, legal, and scientific frames of understanding to win, because the enemy has attacked all our institutions of cultural production.
THEFT: All false pretenses of equality, end of scarcity, human nature and malleability, accumulated genetic load and natural selection, are attempts to evade VOLUNTARY EXCHANGE and to evade limiting insurance to charity in exchange for conformity: doing no harm to commons.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-21 14:37:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1451196014690328583
THE ORIGIN AND REASON FOR MARRIAGE – POLITICAL ECONOMY OF MARRIAGE — “we need to restore legal fault to (the mating) market. The entire courtship market was highly protected in the west until we “liberated” ourselves from law and men no longer can sue for crimes against their family.” — As you say, this is the primary institutional harm. However we also demand disclosure of the number and names of previous partners for marriage, must repair the economy so that it’s in favor of the working and middle classes, and provide basic education in human behavior. Family = Assets in a Private Corporation Just in case anyone tries to argue with me, the origin of the family is as a corporation of shared assets and liabilities, and marriage ritual as public insurance those assets from interference (theft) as commons are insured against interference. That’s the economy of marriage. So the idea that we invented the corporation for capitalism is just another leftist fraud. We can ONLY produce commons by reciprocal insurance of demonstrated interests (investments, assets, property), and the family, the tribe, the polity, the state, were all corporations. That’s what a corporation means: a collection of assets protected by limited liability and insured by the polity against the imposition of costs, whether by harm or privatization, by others. The family is the first corporation we insure. Because it’s the first reason men kill. And the destruction of the MARRIAGE MARKET IS THE PRIMARY REASON MEN REVOLT. Yep. it’s an evolutionary necessity. It can’t be otherwise. It’s the most common reason for revolutions in history. Because it’s an existential threat to the reason we exist: reproduction.
THE ORIGIN AND REASON FOR MARRIAGE – POLITICAL ECONOMY OF MARRIAGE — “we need to restore legal fault to (the mating) market. The entire courtship market was highly protected in the west until we “liberated” ourselves from law and men no longer can sue for crimes against their family.” — As you say, this is the primary institutional harm. However we also demand disclosure of the number and names of previous partners for marriage, must repair the economy so that it’s in favor of the working and middle classes, and provide basic education in human behavior. Family = Assets in a Private Corporation Just in case anyone tries to argue with me, the origin of the family is as a corporation of shared assets and liabilities, and marriage ritual as public insurance those assets from interference (theft) as commons are insured against interference. That’s the economy of marriage. So the idea that we invented the corporation for capitalism is just another leftist fraud. We can ONLY produce commons by reciprocal insurance of demonstrated interests (investments, assets, property), and the family, the tribe, the polity, the state, were all corporations. That’s what a corporation means: a collection of assets protected by limited liability and insured by the polity against the imposition of costs, whether by harm or privatization, by others. The family is the first corporation we insure. Because it’s the first reason men kill. And the destruction of the MARRIAGE MARKET IS THE PRIMARY REASON MEN REVOLT. Yep. it’s an evolutionary necessity. It can’t be otherwise. It’s the most common reason for revolutions in history. Because it’s an existential threat to the reason we exist: reproduction.
THE RESTORATION OF MARRIAGE AS A BUSINESS VENTURE
(The end of the luxury good of romantic marriage.)
Romantic Love as we understand it was INVENTED and not that long ago. Marriage is a business proposition. If it isn’t it’s pointless to produce a corporation (which is what marriage consists of) instead of simply engaging in a market exchange until the opportunity’s exhausted.
And that’s what relationships consist of: opportunities for reciprocal exchange, by the only condition in life where you can exchange putting another’s interests ahead of yours, because they are polar opposites.
Exhaust opportunity, resource, or charge.
It’s just physics. Sorry.
This is a little closer to the voice I’m developing now that we’ve ended the century of romantic love. I think that’s the direction I want to work on, because that’s where I sense we are headed. The romantic dream American dream enlightenment dream all end together. Yep.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-20 14:28:44 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107134328822050828
@Lil_Aspiring_Rapper This is normal destructive behavior that results in any state or empire that expands credit such that returns on men’s productivity is reducded.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-19 08:59:45 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107127372856417354
RT @ThruTheHayes: @curtdoolittle I always framed it as cooperation of the division of labor aiming to improve those returns through time. Y…
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-18 21:10:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1450207764777783302