Category: Economics, Finance, and Political Economy

  • @YeahIStillTrade @Rhodok Of course. Because BTC are shares of stock. IMO, all co

    @YeahIStillTrade@Rhodok Of course. Because BTC are shares of stock. IMO, all companies should issue their own stock on private block chains, all counties should create their own title registries, etc. Crypto is a great savings device specifically because it is insulated from the problems of backed securities. That doesn’t change the fact that the financial system will have it balls cut off in the next decade or so, and that the state will monopolize money creation, returns on money creation, and most likely end the insurance and pension businesses when they do it.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 19:04:30 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107231672402687438

  • November 6th: Our Mission, BTC and Future Money

    November 6th: Our Mission, BTC and Future Money

    https://youtu.be/5ucR4XVJW-Q


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 17:58:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457044719226195976

  • They are going to adopt a state digital currency – we know that. They are just l

    They are going to adopt a state digital currency – we know that. They are just letting the private sector do the R&D and take the R&D risk.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 15:04:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457000970215362564

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford @tweetformoneys @Maxhenr23910621 @KevinRudolphJo1 @LukeWeinhagen @RNP_1 @BadBank8 @FabaraD @JeffJonas @axolotl_Finance @JosephRooke @FD

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457000695710760965

  • BITCOIN, BLOCKCHAIN, THE FUTURE OF MONEY AND ECONOMY I’m not anti-BTC. I’m just

    BITCOIN, BLOCKCHAIN, THE FUTURE OF MONEY AND ECONOMY

    I’m not anti-BTC. I’m just doing my job. That means (a) BTC’s not money, but a fractional divisible share in the btc network (b) dependent upon the BTC network (b) it’s easy for the state to crash its value out of self defense – and it will. It’s an unbacked, uninsured, share in a network – that combines the features of shares of stock and token money.

    IE: Know the downside of investments. Don’t time it. Get out early.

    • “CURT: Do you believe the state will crush blockchain tech as a whole or just the cryptos like BTC that seek to compete with the dollar? I see huge potential in smart contracts and see it as counterproductive to the states interest to destroy it.” –

    1) IMO, more so in the coming near future, than in the past, the state will require and increase monetary levers of influence. So anything that is a threat to fiat currencies will be suppressed. Period. End of story. Does that mean blockchain tech? Absolutely not. 😉

    2)However, in that near-future monetary system we may see an even GREATER disconnect between consumer vs business monetary systems, and spending and saving monetary systems. We are past the point of the utility of a single fiat currency. This has been obvious since late 1980s.

    3) So the question isn’t whether blockchain survives – because the secure-ledger technology is a vast improvement in ownership (title) registry. It’s whether the state tolerates unbacked assets. IMO the state will end bank money creation, and capture all credit money creation.

    4) At present we have about a 1T revenue shortfall. And we have more than 1T involuntarily extracted from the people into the financial sector that should be captured by the state.

    5) With the advent of actuarial data at scale, tradable debt, and treasury insurance, banks have negative value and the financial sector has been able to create a state within a state, and a global state at the cost of the populations of liberal political states.

    It’s fixable.

    6) This is why I say that Blockchain techs are providing free off-book research and development for the state. And that the state is too busy fighting off globalists, populists, and the marxist-pomo revolution, to solve hard problems – only revolution, crash or war will do it.

    7) Over long enough time frames all human behavior is deterministic in the absence of a radical increase in the discovery, production, and application of ever-cheaper energy. There is a very near zero chance that I’m incorrect in my estimation by other than timing.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 14:49:55 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107230671393527036

  • 5) With the advent of actuarial data at scale, tradable debt, and treasury insur

    5) With the advent of actuarial data at scale, tradable debt, and treasury insurance, banks have negative value and the financial sector has been able to create a state within a state, and a global state at the cost of the populations of liberal political states.

    It’s fixable.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 14:40:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456994920762384384

    Reply addressees: @tweetformoneys @Maxhenr23910621 @KevinRudolphJo1 @LukeWeinhagen @RNP_1 @BadBank8 @FabaraD @JeffJonas @axolotl_Finance @JosephRooke @FD

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456994540003397652


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @tweetformoneys @Maxhenr23910621 @KevinRudolphJo1 @LukeWeinhagen @RNP_1 @BadBank8 @FabaraD @JeffJonas @axolotl_Finance @JosephRooke @FD 4) At present we have about a 1T revenue shortfall. And we have more than 1T involuntarily extracted from the people into the financial sector that should be captured by the state.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1456994540003397652

  • 4) At present we have about a 1T revenue shortfall. And we have more than 1T inv

    4) At present we have about a 1T revenue shortfall. And we have more than 1T involuntarily extracted from the people into the financial sector that should be captured by the state.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 14:39:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456994540003397652

    Reply addressees: @tweetformoneys @Maxhenr23910621 @KevinRudolphJo1 @LukeWeinhagen @RNP_1 @BadBank8 @FabaraD @JeffJonas @axolotl_Finance @JosephRooke @FD

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456993933892935680


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @tweetformoneys @Maxhenr23910621 @KevinRudolphJo1 @LukeWeinhagen @RNP_1 @BadBank8 @FabaraD @JeffJonas @axolotl_Finance @JosephRooke @FD 3) So the question isn’t whether blockchain survives – because the secure-ledger technology is a vast improvement in ownership (title) registry. It’s whether the state tolerates unbacked assets. IMO the state will end bank money creation, and capture all credit money creation.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1456993933892935680

  • 3) So the question isn’t whether blockchain survives – because the secure-ledger

    3) So the question isn’t whether blockchain survives – because the secure-ledger technology is a vast improvement in ownership (title) registry. It’s whether the state tolerates unbacked assets. IMO the state will end bank money creation, and capture all credit money creation.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 14:36:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456993933892935680

    Reply addressees: @tweetformoneys @Maxhenr23910621 @KevinRudolphJo1 @LukeWeinhagen @RNP_1 @BadBank8 @FabaraD @JeffJonas @axolotl_Finance @JosephRooke @FD

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456993120340561921


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @tweetformoneys @Maxhenr23910621 @KevinRudolphJo1 @LukeWeinhagen @RNP_1 @BadBank8 @FabaraD @JeffJonas @axolotl_Finance @JosephRooke @FD 2)However, in that near-future monetary system we may see an even GREATER disconnect between consumer vs business monetary systems, and spending and saving monetary systems. We are past the point of the utility of a single fiat currency. This has been obvious since late 1980s.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1456993120340561921

  • 2)However, in that near-future monetary system we may see an even GREATER discon

    2)However, in that near-future monetary system we may see an even GREATER disconnect between consumer vs business monetary systems, and spending and saving monetary systems. We are past the point of the utility of a single fiat currency. This has been obvious since late 1980s.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 14:33:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456993120340561921

    Reply addressees: @tweetformoneys @Maxhenr23910621 @KevinRudolphJo1 @LukeWeinhagen @RNP_1 @BadBank8 @FabaraD @JeffJonas @axolotl_Finance @JosephRooke @FD

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456992451546255363


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @tweetformoneys @Maxhenr23910621 @KevinRudolphJo1 @LukeWeinhagen @RNP_1 @BadBank8 @FabaraD @JeffJonas @axolotl_Finance @JosephRooke @FD 1) IMO, more so in the coming near future, than in the past, the state will require and increase monetary levers of influence. So anything that is a threat to fiat currencies will be suppressed. Period. End of story. Does that mean blockchain tech? Absolutely not. 😉

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1456992451546255363

  • 1) IMO, more so in the coming near future, than in the past, the state will requ

    1) IMO, more so in the coming near future, than in the past, the state will require and increase monetary levers of influence. So anything that is a threat to fiat currencies will be suppressed. Period. End of story. Does that mean blockchain tech? Absolutely not. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 14:30:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456992451546255363

    Reply addressees: @tweetformoneys @Maxhenr23910621 @KevinRudolphJo1 @LukeWeinhagen @RNP_1 @BadBank8 @FabaraD @JeffJonas @axolotl_Finance @JosephRooke @FD

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456860577037434881

  • So when I say I understand the problem of modern economics as well or better tha

    So when I say I understand the problem of modern economics as well or better than anyone, I’m pretty sure I do. But this is because I understand more broadly the failure of the operationalist program, and the emergence of pseudomathematics and pseudoscience because of it.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-11-06 00:10:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456775906350047232

    Reply addressees: @DerekDugin @joeldavisx

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456775511175204868


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @DerekDugin @joeldavisx The problem with the mainstream is lack of information, a failure of accounting of all changes in capital, and failure to measure variation in regular symmetries, using the wrong calculus and a dozen other things more subtle.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1456775511175204868