RT @BTCGandalf: @amasad Makes sense because capital is far more abundant than attention.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-11 20:12:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579927874500722688
Category: Economics, Finance, and Political Economy
-
6/n Ergo hookup culture is serving the interest of a small number of men who ben
6/n Ergo hookup culture is serving the interest of a small number of men who benefit, and a somewhat larger number of women who think they’re benefitting, but are just burning their emotionally adaptive capacity AND the male’s emotionally adaptive capacity.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-11 19:06:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579911323164762113
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579911321281527810
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
5/n Ergo, b/c men need time to emotionally test the potential of a relationship, and that test requires about three months, and that test needs to be ‘shared experiences to form an intuition, then you can either catch a male with shared non-sex experiences or you can’t catch him.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1579911321281527810
-
We knew about the economy. But I had no idea the condition of the RU stores and
We knew about the economy. But I had no idea the condition of the RU stores and military was as bad as it was. No one else I know of did either. It surprised everyone. But, now, in attrition warfare the variables are, stores of tolerance. Even US has limited fire stores left.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-11 15:56:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579863506484334592
Reply addressees: @Max_Stoic
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579848686972305409
-
The argument that I’ve read is that selling multiple homes(apartments) for multi
The argument that I’ve read is that selling multiple homes(apartments) for multiple generations was better than selling one home for multiple generations. The reality is that leaders assumed full integration into the european (northern) model of society evolved under manorialism.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-11 00:44:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579633927270313984
Reply addressees: @LMasterBW @JoshuaLisec
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579591611016970240
-
Sorry, no. You could argue for the mass movement of agrarians to the cities, the
Sorry, no. You could argue for the mass movement of agrarians to the cities, then to little pink houses, fulfilling the promise of middle-class (property-owning) majority. You could argue that small apartments in cities was to prevent intergenerational famlies, and that’s true.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-10 20:54:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579576058076364800
Reply addressees: @JoshuaLisec
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579568688034111488
-
WHY? Because the incentives to reorganize (restructure) have to exist long enoug
WHY? Because the incentives to reorganize (restructure) have to exist long enough, that networks of sustainable specialization, production, finance, and trade adapt to the new circumstances, and deflate (vaporize) the misallocated capital (time).
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-10 18:10:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579534883328000003
Reply addressees: @zerohedge
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579534406959890432
-
How hard is it to destroy $50B in real assets vs financial assets? $50B Financia
How hard is it to destroy $50B in real assets vs financial assets? $50B Financial assets can vaporize overnight. To destroy $50B in real assets takes wars or hurricanes AND bad judgment.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-09 21:04:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579216307224203264
-
All wealth (capital across the spectrum) consists of a store of Time. Some of th
All wealth (capital across the spectrum) consists of a store of Time. Some of that time is stored in real assets, and some of it in financial assets. Real assets exist. Financial interests MIGHT exist. Financial assets are promises. Not all promises are possible to keep.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-09 21:02:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579215805027188736
-
Most wealth of the 1% that’s expanded of late, is just ‘promises’ that are impos
Most wealth of the 1% that’s expanded of late, is just ‘promises’ that are impossible to keep. All financial assets (vs real assets) are mere promises. We control only whether we want to keep our promises. We don’t control whether our promises are possible to keep.
Economies do.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-09 21:00:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1579215244827979776
-
So what you’re not grasping is that I measure ALL capital (hayek) not just incom
So what you’re not grasping is that I measure ALL capital (hayek) not just income statements (keynes). And I ‘price’ the net effect of immigrant traditions, norms, values, on the decline in anglo-germanic capital that was expensive to produce and maybe unreproducible.
Source date (UTC): 2022-10-08 19:31:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1578830432153481216
Reply addressees: @d4n_m4d3r1a @MagixPunx
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1578828522898219009