I”m gonna leave now. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-13 13:09:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613885904338227201
Reply addressees: @shermanklumpp
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613885670384373760
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
tT’s because you’re using lie, deny, evade, demand, and ad hom, instead of doing
tT’s because you’re using lie, deny, evade, demand, and ad hom, instead of doing the work, because you can’t admit you’re wrong, and that you lacked the knowledge to opine and criticize, and you won’t do the work to learn, and adapt your behavior accordingly.
ie: immaturity.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-13 13:08:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613885786448879618
Reply addressees: @rxxvlavagir1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613884807280205827
-
Now you could have just as easily demonstrated your competency by a few searches
Now you could have just as easily demonstrated your competency by a few searches. But you keep doubling down on redirection and ad hominem as a means of avoiding the work that you know you can’t perform (and I know too.)
That this is instinctual behavior isn’t obvious to you.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-13 13:05:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613884846236962818
Reply addressees: @rxxvlavagir1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613883236228419586
-
That said, any competent person would have by now, pulled up google if a nitwit,
That said, any competent person would have by now, pulled up google if a nitwit, and google scholar if educated, and easily found the studies. No one competent would ask another scientist for a study.
So why do you think you work from data? Magazines?
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-13 12:56:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613882649940033539
Reply addressees: @rxxvlavagir1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613881475534917632
-
No, I’m simply illustrating that you disagreed, and demanded I supply data but y
No, I’m simply illustrating that you disagreed, and demanded I supply data but you’re constantly either projecting or offering anectodal experience, without every referring to data, when this subject is so thoroughly discussed that it’s common knowledge in research.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-13 12:50:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613881153152483328
Reply addressees: @rxxvlavagir1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613880388304179204
-
Before I give you the obvious set of answers, are you sure you’ve thought this t
Before I give you the obvious set of answers, are you sure you’ve thought this through enough to opine? Or are you, as is common, projecting yourself and your experience as if you’re average and reasonable? (as most of us do without education in statistics.)
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-13 12:32:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613876530404261892
Reply addressees: @rxxvlavagir1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613874838380204032
-
So yes, either you know enough to make a counter or you can ask for explanation.
So yes, either you know enough to make a counter or you can ask for explanation. But you don’t attack the credibility of someone out of ignorance and disapproval, and demand they educate you. Science falsifies it doesn’t justify. If you don’t know that you failed science. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-13 12:19:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613873474648567809
Reply addressees: @rxxvlavagir1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613866795588255744
-
You just did it again. Instead of asking for clarification (this is twitter) you
You just did it again. Instead of asking for clarification (this is twitter) you put words in my mouth. The argument is that without responsibility we develop irresponsibility, immaturity, and anti-social/political behavior using hyperconsumption (of all sorts) as a substitute.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-13 12:17:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613872896778145793
Reply addressees: @rxxvlavagir1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613866795588255744
-
I just know the game you’re playing – pretense of knowledge in the absence of ev
I just know the game you’re playing – pretense of knowledge in the absence of evidence. So if you have a counter then please provide one. Otherwise, you’re just demonstrating disapproval instead of counterargument.
Intellectually honest people counter with content, not demands.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-13 12:14:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613872188305670144
Reply addressees: @rxxvlavagir1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613867574197895169
-
Can you first share the studies that contradict it? 😉 I’m not doing your work f
Can you first share the studies that contradict it? 😉
I’m not doing your work for you. Arxive, SSRN, and Researchgate are easily accessed via google scholar. Justification isn’t scientific, nor are demands for it – falsification is. So you’re welcome to falsify it if you can.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-13 11:51:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613866312597397505
Reply addressees: @rxxvlavagir1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1613861228106973184