Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

That’s non-logical. And it’s …. embarrassing that you don’t grasp that. It doe

That’s non-logical. And it’s …. embarrassing that you don’t grasp that.

It doesn’t matter what your competency is, it matters what means and end one puts one’s competency to. Why jewish specialization in industries that bait into hazard or facilitate undermining?

Seriously..

Source date (UTC): 2023-01-18 22:51:14 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615844292433711116

Reply addressees: @zagrebbi @ImATennisBall @RukhsanaSukhan @nathancofnas

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615843073296109569

January 18, 2023
You think a lot of things so far without justification. The paper is entitled: –

You think a lot of things so far without justification.
The paper is entitled:
–“Still No Evidence for a Jewish Group Evolutionary Strategy”–
The post is on twitter from cofnas in the last week or so.
My comments and KMac’s are both there.
It’s like debating with toddlers.

Source date (UTC): 2023-01-18 22:49:05 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615843749975756803

Reply addressees: @zagrebbi @ImATennisBall @RukhsanaSukhan @nathancofnas

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615842143301472261

January 18, 2023
There are a tiny number of people capable of this discourse, and I know most of

There are a tiny number of people capable of this discourse, and I know most of them. That doesn’t mean you aren’t capable of some of it. It means that the journey to enable you to engage in it is time consuming and costly for both.

We live in assumptions and approximations.

Source date (UTC): 2023-01-18 22:40:26 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615841573010575360

Reply addressees: @oteycoueye

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615840636523155461

January 18, 2023
Quite the contrary. His most recent paper, and his most recent post here on twit

Quite the contrary. His most recent paper, and his most recent post here on twitter states this directly. No one argues with overrepresentation. We argue with cultural strategy of undermining, sedition, treason and intentional warfare by ‘march through the institutions.”

Source date (UTC): 2023-01-18 22:32:10 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615839491423453185

Reply addressees: @zagrebbi @ImATennisBall @RukhsanaSukhan @nathancofnas

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615838308755546129

January 18, 2023
1. Cofnas is intellectually embarrassing for the vapid criticism that denies tha

1. Cofnas is intellectually embarrassing for the vapid criticism that denies that group strategies exist — when I can identify group strategies just by linguistic analysis, just as we can identify sex, class, ethnicity from it.

Source date (UTC): 2023-01-18 22:05:27 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615832768201596948

Reply addressees: @zagrebbi @ImATennisBall @RukhsanaSukhan @nathancofnas

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615825195079708673

January 18, 2023
Dunno. Don’t even know who he is. Some right winger who writes articles of diffe

Dunno. Don’t even know who he is. Some right winger who writes articles of different quality now and then. Just popped up in a list of searches on jewish advocacy of undermining (decadence) throughout history. Usually it’s been for profit but also for cultural undermining.

Source date (UTC): 2023-01-18 21:23:23 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615822183342964736

Reply addressees: @UnofficialWake @PMulquiney

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615820112376004608

January 18, 2023
Non argument. Just the opposite. Well documented. You just won’t read the docume

Non argument.
Just the opposite.
Well documented.
You just won’t read the documentation.
Read your own: Fatal Embrace by Ginsberg.
You can’t handle MacDonald
You most likely can’t even understand my work.
You see the issue as jewish and I see it as feminine and unconscious.

Source date (UTC): 2023-01-18 21:20:05 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615821352665255937

Reply addressees: @zagrebbi @ImATennisBall @RukhsanaSukhan

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615820499900325889

January 18, 2023
Predicted feminine retreat into ad hom, disapproval, and attacks on reputation a

Predicted feminine retreat into ad hom, disapproval, and attacks on reputation as a means of distraction from the argument that can’t be won, because the position you hold is criminal rather than ‘relative’.

Source date (UTC): 2023-01-18 21:01:42 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615816726523830272

Reply addressees: @oteycoueye

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615816141758242857

January 18, 2023
Meant as ironic humor illustrating the general problem of discourse between anon

Meant as ironic humor illustrating the general problem of discourse between anons on matters requiring knowledge and understanding not commonly held.

I’m sure you’ll be fine. 😉

Source date (UTC): 2023-01-18 20:37:18 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615810584087302168

Reply addressees: @KittyGrumble @Outkick

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615810137368760342

January 18, 2023
If you’re intellectually honest, then I have time. If you’re going to waste my t

If you’re intellectually honest, then I have time. If you’re going to waste my time with intellectual dishonesty, then no. The general problem lies is whether one is conscious of one’s intellectual dishonesty. 😉

So, assuming yes, … then yes I’m willing to talk.

Source date (UTC): 2023-01-18 20:28:15 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615808307960102912

Reply addressees: @KittyGrumble @Outkick

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615807641703354389

January 18, 2023