-“And you presume to know anything about argumentation? You have a lot of learning to do, including in the areas you think you know.”-
(a) conflates formal argument (proofs) with informal (debate) (b) conflates persuade with testify (c) conflates neutrality with criminality.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 15:08:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616090316645490688
Reply addressees: @TheRealNewsGeek
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616087347333832707
You levied an accusation.
I responded in kind.
That’s reciprocity.
See?
I work in decidability and law.
This work is declarative.
One only explains.
Not persuades.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 14:17:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616077461392875522
Reply addressees: @TheRealNewsGeek
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616057695257108481
Not my point, was it. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 12:13:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616046274578468865
Reply addressees: @FlashGorgone
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616029827198320641
(Grow up.)
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 12:12:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616046025650896897
Reply addressees: @TheRealNewsGeek
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616038491795722242
It’s true of the memes people reply to me with, in order to avoid saying anything intelligent.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 00:44:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615872823804698627
Reply addressees: @muddafokka
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615872093689634816
That painfully truthful answer stated:
If I could talk to Nietzche and explain what he was ‘getting wrong’, and listen to his reaction, I might find that useful. Because while his project failed, his original insight into the ancients was necessary for the restoration of civ.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 00:44:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615872674705838080
Reply addressees: @philosophytweet
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615571221696872450
PAINFULLY TRUTHFUL ANSWER
At the end of your study of philosophy, like Durant, you come to the conclusion that (a) there aren’t any worth talking to (b) most did more harm than good (c) history is the source of knowledge of man (d) only natural philosophy improved mankind.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 00:42:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615872180381749249
Reply addressees: @philosophytweet
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615571221696872450
Surprising. That’s the smart answer. And I didn’t think of it. Just imagine what you could learn and bring forward and back to life in modernity…
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 00:38:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615871174038196226
Reply addressees: @liwawil @philosophytweet
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615584842908844032
Yes.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 00:33:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615869976384241664
Reply addressees: @EricMorganCoach @Turbo_Flux @WalterIII @TheAutistocrat @StephenThomasHC
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615869765838307329
What part of -“Still No Evidence for a Jewish Group Evolutionary Strategy”- did you fail to interpret. Or that this is the foundation of the dispute between KM and NC
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 00:30:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615869185476771840
Reply addressees: @zagrebbi @ImATennisBall @RukhsanaSukhan @nathancofnas
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615844759381184515