—“Turns out that assuming the worst has very high predictive power.”– Martin Stepan
(genius) https://twitter.com/TheAutistocrat/status/1616142328179064854
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 18:44:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616144468570144773
https://twitter.com/TheAutistocrat/status/1616142328179064854
@Contrafabian is equally good at behavioral econ, and the economics of political economy. Ask him also.
We have many others at different stages who I won’t ‘volunteer’. 😉
My specialty is still the logics. I expect the team to surpass me in every aspect other than the logics.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 17:25:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616124793539158016
@TheAutistocrat (Martin Stepan) is, outside of the logics, equal or better than I am at political economy ov behavioral – and he’s not as ‘gentle’ as I am in stating judgments.
Ask him. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 17:22:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616123939071180824
@LukeWeinhagen is very, very, very good at use of behavioral economics by constructive proofs (falsifiction) from first principles, and discovery of any ‘crime’ that deviates from testimony and reciprocity within the limits of proportionality.
His answers are concrete.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 17:20:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616123358298488866
Strategy:
When accused, attacked, or insulted, in lieu of rational reciprocal question and argument:
a) return the insult
b) state the central point
c) repeat until iteratively exposing the error deception or fraud committed by the opposition
d) Or until reciprocity restored.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 17:14:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616121897036529665
Reply addressees: @TheRealNewsGeek
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616115208845402112
( Just the fact that you said that so accurately made my day. 😉 )
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 17:11:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616121232847519764
Reply addressees: @ahumagb
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616111737006325762
@Contrafabian, @TheAutistocrat , @ThruTheHayes , @Turbo_Flux, or anyone else in the organization or among followers care to read this thread and explain whether I or this fellow aren’t learning something?
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 17:10:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616121047442505743
Reply addressees: @TheRealNewsGeek
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616115208845402112
Time stamps. You began with an accusation.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 15:30:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616095849406160903
Reply addressees: @TheRealNewsGeek
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616090611517456385
“Thus Endeth The Lesson”
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 15:20:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616093232479207425
Reply addressees: @TheRealNewsGeek
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616087347333832707
So your failure of due diligence was making a presumption and rendering an accusation, rather than asking a question and seeking to understand. That’s why I often react as would any judge, by intolerance and judgment of criminal behavior in the process of any discovery process.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 15:16:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616092250152521729
Reply addressees: @TheRealNewsGeek
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616087347333832707