So, Rupert Sheldrake is the canonical example of a white pseudoscientist. Now, compare him with Iain McGilchrist. Is he fully a white pseudoscientist, or is he an admixture of scientist, philosopher, and theologian just ‘twisting’ the science a bit for ideological purposes?
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 17:49:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616493071105142784
And you can testify to that by what means?
😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 17:46:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616492499261849630
Reply addressees: @LotteSchwert
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616491857197895681
We get white pseudoscientists like Rupert Sheldrake (if we can even call him a scientist). Or Jewish pseudoscientists(boaz, freud, marx, lewontin, gould, rez, kelsen, dworkin, cantor, bohr) or magical thinkers (neoMarxist, postmodern,feminist).
Why are Jews believable vs Whites?
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 17:41:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616491149316718626
(See if I can start something… lol)
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 17:32:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616488791601971213
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616488790071050242
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
Examples:
Be Worthy Of: Anne Hathaway (Aspirations)
Be Married To: Amy Adams (Devotion)
Be in a Relationship With: “Any British Female Scientist & Public Intellectual” (Compatibility)
Kiss: Avril Lavigne (Attraction:those lips!)
Have S_x With: Kimbra (mind-body integration)
😉
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1616488790071050242
I almost never share memes, but this one has too much truth to it not to. https://twitter.com/1vile_dreg/status/1616422043200667650
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 16:06:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616467255495106560
Following @JoshMBlackman who is doing the world a great service by sharing his classes on Youtube. (I’m a promoter of him and his work because he maintains the classical to libertarian devotion to the craft of law vs the ideology of positive ‘law’.).
1/3
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 15:50:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616463282721759236
Correct.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 15:43:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616461412938747905
Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616460708488806400
Probably dishonestly asked, but a great question even if it requires a (long) series of tweets to answer. Maybe after coffee I can make time to answer. Because IMO the confusion, not just among the public, but among academics and scientists is relatively easy to explain.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 14:31:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616443203883786242
Reply addressees: @normiecore @zagrebbi @ImATennisBall @RukhsanaSukhan @nathancofnas
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616201737743761410
Too many permutations of possible interpretation for me to evaluate that. Help?
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 22:08:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616195853353422862
Reply addressees: @PaulBard73
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616194857898508289
Yes.
Source date (UTC): 2023-01-19 19:46:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616160104121778176
Reply addressees: @Sargon_of_Akkad
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616006244367568898