Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

IMO this conversation, though I had hope for it, is unprofitable. It is too far a reframing to accomplish in tweets. I don’t see an avenue for explaining the difference between a statement of human behavior, scale, and limits, from which we can predict outcomes to ‘Good'(moral).

No tho we’ve approached him through a 3rd party and he won’t engage which is unfortunate, because we’d all be better off if he and I could work on a synthesis continuing the Augustine->Aquinas program that failed to produce a thought leader in the 1800s saving faith from marxism.

Working on something. If I don’t respond by tomorrow pls remind me because it’s an important disambiguation that I assume is obvious, but isn’t.

Maintain decorum please.

(Unconstructive) Martin is just trying to understand, but he’s not wrapping his logic in respectful prose because he doesn’t understand your frame of reference despite that it’s indifferent from his.