Yes, but of course, I agree with you on most everything, and I think anyone who knows both of us knows that. I consider you one of the only adult voices on the activist right. And I consider voluntary separation and reconstitution the optimum mid-term and long-term strategy. That’s in part because it’s ethical, moral, pragmatic, and actionable. And it’s the same reason I support the Quakers, the Amish and the Mennonites the ‘last time this happened’. But I can’t overcome the propaganda sufficiently to disambiguate your understanding from anyone’s because the enemy has been too successful. I prefer avoiding past models, and instead just fixing the classical liberal model to avoid any negative association that forces me to argue against phantoms of propaganda, imagination, fiction, and neuroticism. So as long as movements like yours associate with past models you’re tainted by association. Instead, I’d prefer derivation from the classical liberal anglo program, with constitutions and laws that correct for the sins of the 19th and 20th on all sides. -hugs
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-27 16:57:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1630250770527404034