Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

😉

Sorry boss. Apologies.
Given this thread’s continuous stream of masculine adolescence, it’s easy to miss a cue.

Good at everything, really.
Can’t match you in sarcasm though. 😉
And I certainly can’t tolerate the patience you have with the literature.
But it’s good to see you’re getting there with female cognition and irresponsibility. Saw you finally get there with the law too.
Props for taking the religio-philosophical position instead of civilizational differences in their construction.
No need for you to step on the third rail.
Much easier to reach an audience; much more common knowledge and empathy.
Complaining rather is also entertaining and supportive of the listener.
Logic, Econ, and law are too far a reach.
But, that’s what’s required for writing those laws.
And that’s what I do.
-Cheers

Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames @Napleone

Good at everything, really.
Can’t match you in sarcasm though. 😉
And I certainly can’t tolerate the patience you have with the literature.
But it’s good to see you’re getting there with female cognition and irresponsibility. Saw you finally get there with the law too.
Props for taking the religio-philosophical position instead of civilizational differences in their construction.
No need for you to step on the third rail.
Much easier to reach an audience; much more common knowledge and empathy.
Complaining rather is also entertaining and supportive of the listener.
Logic, Econ, and law are too far a reach.
But, that’s what’s required for writing those laws.
And that’s what I do.
-Cheers

Thanks. Makes sense.