Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

There is no substance to that argument other than pleading for people to share your priorities and sentiments. I realize it is driven by your intuition more so than reason, and that’s not a bad thing. It doesn’t mean it’s substantive (true).
Yes, every property of the universe can be, incrementally, reduced back to the quantum field, and the law of entropy vs negative entropy. I know. I can do it.
So yes, causality is reducible as I said.
This is method of construction from irreducible first principles is how we falsify the spectrum of deception by loading, framing, obscuring, fictions, fictionalisms, lying, denying, evading, projecting, undermining, and canceling.
No, what you are trying to do, is empathize with another person’s struggles so that we can help them or resist them depending upon whether their actions lead to good or ill.
That is a different question. It’s an INDIVIDUAL question.
Of course we can try to accomodate one another, as individuals.
But if we want to understand everyone’s behavior regardless of the individual, yes it’s reducible to acquisition(personal) and resonsibility (social).
That doesn’t change causality.
And the causality I gave is true – precisely because it’s the first principle: the most reducible cause of the subsequent consequences.

(And what this method is called, is contructivist logic. It’s the means of falsifying any truth claim. It’s derived from intutionistic mathematics, and subsequently the evolution of mathematics into computation, consisting of sequences of operations.)

Cheers

Reply addressees: @MichaelPlotke @ConceptualJames

There is no substance to that argument other than pleading for people to share your priorities and sentiments. I realize it is driven by your intuition more so than reason, and that’s not a bad thing. It doesn’t mean it’s substantive (true).
Yes, every property of the universe can be, incrementally, reduced back to the quantum field, and the law of entropy vs negative entropy. I know. I can do it.
So yes, causality is reducible as I said.
This is method of construction from irreducible first principles is how we falsify the spectrum of deception by loading, framing, obscuring, fictions, fictionalisms, lying, denying, evading, projecting, undermining, and canceling.
No, what you are trying to do, is empathize with another person’s struggles so that we can help them or resist them depending upon whether their actions lead to good or ill.
That is a different question. It’s an INDIVIDUAL question.
Of course we can try to accomodate one another, as individuals.
But if we want to understand everyone’s behavior regardless of the individual, yes it’s reducible to acquisition(personal) and resonsibility (social).
That doesn’t change causality.
And the causality I gave is true – precisely because it’s the first principle: the most reducible cause of the subsequent consequences.

(And what this method is called, is contructivist logic. It’s the means of falsifying any truth claim. It’s derived from intutionistic mathematics, and subsequently the evolution of mathematics into computation, consisting of sequences of operations.)

Cheers