I know that you probably won’t appreciate this, but I’m absolutely not interested in reaching the most people. Instead, only a certain group of people with the potential to produce a meaningful difference in the world. Reaching people who cannot understand, or even if they can will require incentives they dont have, or time and effort we don’t have, is unproductive. So we use the bait for those we wish to catch.
In a broader context, we can see the radical dumbing down of the common folk by converting from the rigor of the written word to the laxity of the spoken word. Sentence composition alone cuases the organization of thoughts, which accumulates over time in greater cognitive ability.
And lastly, the possibility of educating the opposition appears to never have been achievable (political bias when divided by sex in the absence of the dominance of the family, is genetic). The possibility of ‘democratic’ solutions appears to have been exhausted. The possibility of legislative solutions appears to have been exhausted. All we have left are the courts, and a revolt with demand for remediation in imitation of the founders.
I need jurists.
But thanks for otherwise good advice. 😉
Reply addressees: @dannysmanifesto