(Had this happen twice so far.)
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-30 02:14:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641262484811030528
Reply addressees: @NoahRevoy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641145660601663492
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
Interesting suggestion. thank you
Interesting suggestion. thank you.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-30 02:12:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641262131076005889
Reply addressees: @tysonmaly
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641261140725452801
-
I should have seen that coming. 😉
I should have seen that coming. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-30 02:07:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641260876719161346
Reply addressees: @MaunaLoona
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641260589308841984
-
Love the parsimony and clarity. But the lesson may need a third sentence. There
Love the parsimony and clarity.
But the lesson may need a third sentence.
There are slow kids in the lower strata that otherwise won’t understand. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-30 02:00:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641259162712547330
Reply addressees: @Sean91342987
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641258728363118592
-
Not sure who this was directed to. If me, then please explain how I was ‘wrong’.
Not sure who this was directed to. If me, then please explain how I was ‘wrong’. If not then I”ll move along. (that rhymed!) lol 😉
It ought to be interesting.
(1. criticism of the same slope, when that’s a ‘feature’ not a ‘bug’. 2. Criticism of the application of ENA when that’s also a feature not a bug. 3. Pretty sure you don’t grasp what they are measuring and why. And no I’m not going to explain it so one can claim one does. 😉 )
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-30 01:56:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641258175688048640
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640692096452444162
-
Not sure who this was directed to. If me, then please explain how I was ‘wrong’.
Not sure who this was directed to. If me, then please explain how I was ‘wrong’. If not then I”ll move along. (that rhymed!) lol 😉
It ought to be interesting.
(1. criticism of the same slope, when that’s a ‘feature’ not a ‘bug’. 2. Criticism of the application of ENA when that’s also a feature not a bug. 3. Pretty sure you don’t grasp what they are measuring and why. And no I’m not going to explain it so one can claim one does. 😉 )Reply addressees: @barabam2331 @NoFriendlyFireX
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-30 01:56:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641258175583191041
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640692096452444162
-
Because it’s not a bug, it’s a feature. 😉
Because it’s not a bug, it’s a feature. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-30 01:46:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641255586716086274
Reply addressees: @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641251296580894720
-
Yes
Yes. https://t.co/4St9Gbdcje
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-29 22:16:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641202794383147019
Reply addressees: @nanaetman
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641200969974267909
-
No
No.
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1641200345576620043
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-29 22:15:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641202522013433860
Reply addressees: @superkanga
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641194496003293184
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1641200345576620043
-
OMG stop
OMG stop.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-29 20:17:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641172669860044803
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1641170008465199108