–“The continental tradition got lost in Transcendental Historicism.”–
–“The big questions are dismissed as irrelevant.”–
–“I see the possibility of getting past this.”–
–“I am a naturalist in that there is no higher thing.”–
–Zizek
Hmm. He doesn’t say much other than criticism but some of his criticism is worth the effort. π
It’s a lot easier to explain that philosophy is the bridge between theology and science(economics, law) just as theology is the bridge between mythology and philosophy.
I don’t see what I do as philosophy, but it does answer the three categorical questions of existence, epistemology, and preference (or the good)
I just see it as explaining in textual terms ordinal computation. So if philosophy is explanation and science is causation, then that’s fine. But as far as I know, philosophy is now limited to choice within the limits discovered by science. And science can only say what is good and true, it cannot say which good to choose.