(smart)
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-29 16:47:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674459563834179585
Reply addressees: @MathPolice @toodarkmark @TheAutistocrat
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674458868808818688
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
@C0Wendeil Compliments: Don’t know you, or of you. Listened to your Twitter stre
@C0Wendeil
Compliments:
Don’t know you, or of you. Listened to your Twitter stream tonight – by accident. I was more than overwhelmingly impressed by your knowledge, grasp of history and policy, incentives and motives, strategy, characters and events. Your ability to immediately recall detail and structure narratives without hesitation to make your points, and to do so by appealing to ‘reasonableness’ in the audience is extraordinary.
Thanks for building my confidence in mankind. 😉
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-29 03:51:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674264312016171009
-
RT @C0Wendeil
RT @C0Wendeil: https://t.co/b7F6UCXTNh
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-29 03:34:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674260030026022912
-
Carlos, As someone much older that has been involved for decades, your outline l
Carlos,
As someone much older that has been involved for decades, your outline looks about correct.
Only reaction I had going through it, is that you’re using abstract names for physical processes and regions in the brain, and you might consider “physical thing as abstract name” section heads – this would anchor (legitimize) your framing.
Something akin to:
Sensation (nerves) as …..
Disambiguation (neural columns) as …..
Adversarial Organization (rear and side neocortex) as …..
Episodic Modeling (hippocampal(indexing)) as …..
Autoassociative Prediction (hippocampal vs neocortex)as …..
Adversarial Valuation (neocortex, thalamus, brain stem) as …..
Attention capture (Thalamus) as …..
Executive function (prefrontal cortex) as …..
Recursion (working memory, recursion (wayfinding)) as …..
Just a suggestion so that you aren’t written off as philosophizing independent of physical causality instead of trying to communicate effectively to the reader.
CurtReply addressees: @dela3499
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-29 02:59:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674251142321037312
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673522797727961088
-
I’m pretty sure its gonna say you’re descended from scoundrels. 🙂 But that just
I’m pretty sure its gonna say you’re descended from scoundrels. 🙂 But that just means you’re in good company with the rest of us. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-28 06:33:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673942790353371136
Reply addressees: @bryanbrey @Hail__To_You @CSoothsayings
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673823398894370819
-
Oh. A good person. Thank you for being you. 😉
Oh. A good person. Thank you for being you. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-28 06:18:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673938860357611521
Reply addressees: @KurtosisEnjoyer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673929408376107010
-
(She’s 6′, but only 130lbs)
(She’s 6′, but only 130lbs)
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-28 00:42:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673854299166720002
Reply addressees: @Hail__To_You @AnnCoulter @anntensity
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673821520492208129
-
If you ever want to know why you don’t understand, I’ll explain behavioral scien
If you ever want to know why you don’t understand, I’ll explain behavioral science to you in terms you can. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-27 23:21:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673833994809491457
Reply addressees: @RWiSblog @JamesDebord18 @charlesmurray
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673824249444810752
-
I just love teasing y’all. 😉
I just love teasing y’all. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-27 23:19:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673833423352258562
Reply addressees: @DMBG44 @AdamMGrant @MaxBoot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673832234728423424
-
Happy to test that hypothesis, because it’s almost certain to be false as nearly
Happy to test that hypothesis, because it’s almost certain to be false as nearly anyone who has ever spoken to me for more than a few minutes will attest. 😉
You’ve done good quality clerical work in the sciences. But you haven’t contributed to them with insight or innovation. Or created an intellectual movement. Or built a business of any scale, showing competence with organizing and inspiring human achievement.
And your only response to accusations of ignorance of the subject matter which you question as an act of disapproval is ad hominem. Either you know the subject matter or you don’t, I do. In fact one of my areas of specialization is sex differences in cognition, and in particular, lying.
So please don’t waste any more of my time – unless intellectual honesty and doing the work is something you aspire to.Reply addressees: @RWiSblog @JamesDebord18 @charlesmurray
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-27 23:00:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673828699370602497
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673824249444810752