Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

So true. And preferable. 😉 https://twitter.com/MadMenQts/status/1680221005778747394

I dunno. There are wanna-be race car drivers out there who buy a car with potential they rarely use on the tracks, and larpers who never use that potential even on the tracks.

I had a 911 Turbo X50, and while porsche quality is unmistakable in every possible way it was not enjoyable to drive. My Ferrari 355 was a bit fragile and shop-friendly, but the most graceful experience that I always found a luxury. Gor daily driving my BoxsterX, lowered, with special wheels and exhaust was about the best experience overall. That said I remain a Jaguar devotee and have been most of my life.

So I think if you can afford exotics you’re expressing your aesthetics both in values, identity, and status.

Reply addressees: @FarajRashi93307 @_Rian_Stone

Yes max, but you’re smart, knowledgeable insightful competivtive energetic and charming.
What about normal people?

Signed
“A Max Fan”

(Sorry. Just HAD to say it.) 😉

And you’re ugly, and your mother dresses you funny…

(thx) 😉

Martin’s painfujl brevity at work. 😉 https://twitter.com/TheAutistocrat/status/1680659963725721601

(correct)

I’m a genius my every known measure.
You would need to construct some argument that demonstrated you aren’t the fool instead. 😉

Correct on all counts.

Been thinking about this on and off for the past hour. And rather like the framing of anglo philosophy being true (useful), german being intellectually profound, russian literature emotionally profound, and french philosophy fanciful.