You are, in my limited experience with you, you are intelligent, moral, empathic and consistent in searching for the good, with limited, but some reluctant resistance to the true. Much of how we interpet wisdom literature is dependent upon our individual responsibilities. And if…
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-23 03:16:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682952895413596160
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682829744662773760
And that is why I appreciate, follow, and share your work and others in your network. 😉
That doesnt mean I wont interject if I think you might be either wrong or misinterpreted – given I appreciate those in our organization and out when my rather parsmonious and brutally dense prose is easily misunderstood or I am wrong … something our Institute Fellow Martin Stepan considers almost as substantive part of his occupation as teaching the material. 😉
hugs. 😉
Reply addressees: @ArtyArtHistory
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-23 02:29:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682941028427235328
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682937917625311234
How could you both read, opine on the subject and not comprehend thats what I said? 😉 Though I’m aware of the tendency of a certain demographic’s conitive bias in a tendecy to literal interpretation, I dont usually encounter it in philosophy and aesthetics. Possibly an age and… https://t.co/1H58MiAsQV
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-23 02:08:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682935805537316864
Reply addressees: @ArtyArtHistory @histofarch
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682929002279780353
RT @ThruTheHayes: @AlainVarenne @curtdoolittle @ConceptualJames https://twitter.com/ThruTheHayes/status/1661375840339337226
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-22 23:04:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682889418279903233
Sure.
Steel mills.
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-22 19:31:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682835683923075072
Reply addressees: @RESchriver @primalpoly @levie
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682833265361580035
I understand – in that context. My concern still stands. Because having taught this subject matter (and others), there is a tendency for students of any age to frame the ideas as they wish.
When I teach art theory and interpretation I do so by addressing every interpretive dimension: craftsmanship (materials, technology, ability), design(as a technology), narrative (metaphysics, values), and social, economic, political civilizational context.
Anyway. You do great work. Love reading your posts. Just doing my job so to speak. 😉
Reply addressees: @ArtyArtHistory
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-22 18:48:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682825053652635653
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682821175137693697
Love you brother.
The burden of understanding.
But it creates the strength of agency. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-22 18:22:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682818477780791298
Reply addressees: @CDismal18229
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682814959426719746
RT @SRCHicks: Stanford’s going through a terrible time now, paying for its recent moral and philosophical laxness.
Yet it’s a positive les…
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-22 17:57:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682812117899005952
Not doing it here. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-22 17:33:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682806025466814464
Reply addressees: @auny_marie @cenkuygur
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682760189542268928
(I live to serve. 😉 )
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-22 17:30:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682805432409006080
Reply addressees: @AlainVarenne @Chrece007 @sama
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682801171902214144