Thx. π
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 22:56:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691222188764864513
Reply addressees: @FlorianRose_
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691221565373837314
Thx. π
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 22:56:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691222188764864513
Reply addressees: @FlorianRose_
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691221565373837314
Sure but it’s easy.
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 22:34:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691216785566027777
Reply addressees: @FarajRashi93307
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691210952866222080
Correct.
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 21:37:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691202347874004992
Reply addressees: @Obediencio1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691193472735236096
Hate on Sandra Bullock of all people?
What kind of trashy people in this world prosecute an actor for playing a role in a script flawlessly? What has SB ever done other than make a (very, very) poor choice of a marital partner – even if she recovered from it somewhat gracefully?
How was she supposed to know whether a script is in fact testifiable in court? Actors are entertainers who perform to a script the purpose of which isn’t to convey facts, but emotions.
Actors aren’t rocket scientists (that’s for sure). They’re often the least informed, least educated, people living in the most insular artificial illusory bubble in the entire population. And they are more likely to be mentally ill because if it by orders of magnitude compared to the rest of the population.
In fact, career actors would be better off, and we would too, if they were prohibited from using the fame of acting to leverage public speech on matters other than acting.
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 21:00:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691193033360859136
Thank you.
Fully appropriate hugs, man. π
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 20:45:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691189354985668608
Reply addressees: @FarajRashi93307
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691160575651291136
I agree with rectifiability. I’m comfortable with ‘simply’. But I’m not so sure about the ‘easy’ bit. π
-hugs.
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 20:45:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691189209774649345
Reply addressees: @WerrellBradley @ThruTheHayes @BrianRoemmele
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691166366194376704
lol…. I’m sure I would adore you and find endless opportunities for conversation – just as I do with any even vaguely self-aware person on the spectrum. π
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 20:41:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691188223723048962
Reply addressees: @batchestgirl
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691171486529392642
COOPERATION BY MECHANISM – NOT INTELLIGENCE
Re: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0a3xg4M9Oa8
Apologies for the reaction to well-intentioned pseudoscientific fictionalism for the purpose of promotion of science via appeal to populism through the continued abuse of the human want of anthropomorphicβ¦
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 18:00:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691147810115039237
My Unconscious Shortcut Twitter Responses. π
(No particular order) (I ought to make macros π )
1. Yes.
2. Correct.
3. Well done.
4. Brilliant.
5. (sigh…)
6. Um. No.
7. Correct. Apologies.
8. Sorry. I apologize.
9. Have I told you I love you lately?
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 17:15:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691136564745707520
My Unconscious Shortcut Twitter Responses. π
(No particular order) (I ought to make macros π )
1. Yes.
2. Correct.
3. Well done.
4. Brilliant.
5. (sigh…)
6. Um. No.
7. Correct. Apologies.
8. Sorry. I apologize.
9. Have I told you I love you lately?
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 17:15:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691136564674310153