Its demonstrable. Evidential. Sorry. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-21 15:54:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693652807776149723
Reply addressees: @MaxImp707
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693650735253078037
Its demonstrable. Evidential. Sorry. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-21 15:54:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693652807776149723
Reply addressees: @MaxImp707
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693650735253078037
–“Q: Why bother arguing with a know it all?”–
Well, because I do rigorous research, do in fact know more than you do – and more than all but a few do, and across all domains of knowledge. So if you sought agency via truth and understanding then argument might help you learn, and gain agency.
But you don’t argue because you are incapable of other than feminine denial, projection, pretence of the value of your opinion, approval, or cooperation, which is the infantile retreat of the incompetent when faced with reality that displeases them. In other words you’e only capable of continuing tantrums of rebellion against nature’s demand for your maturity into knowledge, competency, responsibility that we call adulthood.
Its probably the result of genetic, class, and parental failure – so we can’t necessarily expect better of you.
Reply addressees: @MaxImp707
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-21 15:39:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693649111554170880
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693641971544248654
Not an argument.
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-21 07:11:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693521251887730693
Reply addressees: @MaxImp707
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693481698581676361
Its over your head. Dont worry. Move along. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-21 03:44:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693469113232810084
Reply addressees: @MaxImp707
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693464176654422179
You err. The evidence is the opposite.
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-20 20:27:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693359165605847374
Reply addressees: @WestCoastrj1 @Miles4Jemima @dnstewart67 @BladeoftheS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693357960901390556
funny. yes. 😉
cc: @WerrellBradley
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-20 19:52:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693350414761017624
Reply addressees: @JohannNetram
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693347838955065403
Did I make that claim? no.
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-20 19:24:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693343374957224152
Reply addressees: @smptelock @RyanLinandkevin @BladeoftheS
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693334086427767288
And…. more…
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1671591474260058113
Now you don’t know that this is what I do for a living, so you are I’m sure a decent person, but there is more to the matter than you appear to comprehend. And I’m curious how a judge would come to the conclusion you have which is a…
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-20 17:59:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693321842705023168
Reply addressees: @RuleZeroDAD @_Rian_Stone
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693317977603530945
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1671591474260058113
And…. more…
https://t.co/Roz7Q1kIZ1
Now you don’t know that this is what I do for a living, so you are I’m sure a decent person, but there is more to the matter than you appear to comprehend. And I’m curious how a judge would come to the conclusion you have which is a presumption that shouldn’t survive the study of the history of the common law.
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-20 17:59:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693321842629517312
Evidently not. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-08-20 17:53:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693320255387373841
Reply addressees: @_Rian_Stone
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1693319398445010957