Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

There is no good argument, which is obvious when we list responsibilities
Natural Law: Limits (via Negativa)
Court: Commonality (via Negativa)
Legislature: Concurrency (via Positiva)
Cabinet(executive): Priority (via Positiva)
Monarchy: Judge of last resort. (Decidability)

— Curt Doolittle (@curtdoolittle) January 14, 2023

As such, as I intend to mean it, via-negativa, scientific, law(limits) with variable decision making (Schimdts problem), from the individual(aesthetics), to the polity(economy) to the monarchy(general, military) achieve maximization of 'will to power' for all those CAPABLE of it.

— Curt Doolittle (@curtdoolittle) January 31, 2023

So, the state is just an insurer of last resort consisting of a judge of last resort (monarchy, king, chieftain,), a court, and a military. A government exists for the production of commons – often just systems of measurement. Conflating the two during the enlightenment was bad.

— Curt Doolittle (@curtdoolittle) February 1, 2023

Um. America, like England, with a Germanic monarchy, in a West Germanic Country, speaking a west germanic language, by germanic Anglo Saxon tribes, conquered by germanic normans, who were largely mounted anglo saxons who'd learned french and french administration, under the…

— Curt Doolittle (@curtdoolittle) February 28, 2023

Q: CURT ARE YOU A MONARCHIST?
Depends on the meaning of the term.

A king/queen is a chieftain(headman) that may be elected or hereditary. A monarchy is a king/queen under the european common law, christianity, and is hereditary. A Constitutional monarchy explicilty states the…

— Curt Doolittle (@curtdoolittle) April 8, 2023

https://twitter.com/_Itsmrfoxy_/status/1644830994191491080

–"Q: Curt: Why do you advocate for monarchy?"–

Technically I advocate for rule of law by the natural law and monarchy is a necessary institution. Meaning monarchy provides a judge of last resort given the tendency of all political organizations to fail, due to accumulated… https://t.co/Mk77EI3nlL

— Curt Doolittle (@curtdoolittle) May 14, 2023

The absence of the monarchy would have no impact on that whatsoever. You'd have to be absolutely ignorant of basic economies to think so. There is always a pretense that if X isn't done then Y can be instead, and this is the silly game silly people play in their heads, without…

— Curt Doolittle (@curtdoolittle) August 17, 2023

You are mistaken. There are no systems that abandon the monarchy as the ultimate veto that are better than those that do. And the sovereignty of th parliament over the constitution, or in the (omg) continental law, where the elites are sovereign, is a catastrope.
The people…

— Curt Doolittle (@curtdoolittle) August 18, 2023

WHAT DO WE MEAN BY MONARCHY?

–"It's not even, technically speaking, a monarchy if the monarch doesn't have a final say, make the exceptions and interpretations." – Martin Stepan (@TheAutistocrat)

Agreed.
0. Kingdom (non european)
1. … monarchy (christian european, c.e.)
2.…

— Curt Doolittle (@curtdoolittle) May 14, 2023