Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • You can do your own research. If you don’t know how to user Perplexity AI then l

    You can do your own research.
    If you don’t know how to user Perplexity AI then learn.
    If you can’t do the research, then there is no merit in your criticism.
    It wouldn’t hurt to start with Reich on genetics.
    The research on neotenic expression (domestication syndrome) is voluminous.
    The research on neoteny in humans is voluminous.
    The research on both canines and apes is voluminous.
    Again, you’re nobody. You have no arguments. You post no criticism other than ignorance. There are potential criticisms of the existing science that you would easily offer if you knew the first thing about the subject matter. And I have no obligation to service people who are intellectually dishonest, and morally questionable when they’re claiming competence they obviously lack.

    I’m notorious for demanding critics ‘show intellectual honesty first’ because as anyone who follows me knows, I don’t hold any opinions that are strictly constructed from the research.

    Reply addressees: @nthg2see @BTC_i_Hodl @Mbali_2466 @_TOLANI_


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 19:11:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697688531617943552

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697672931948523779

  • (and yes that’s where smart guys like you come in.) Love you man. Thank you for

    (and yes that’s where smart guys like you come in.)

    Love you man.
    Thank you for the work you do.
    Just stay within decorum so you stay online here. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 18:06:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697672282255004116

    Reply addressees: @radiofreenw

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697664289669255639

  • CORRECTION “9. Political discourse is dominated by feminine and infantile irresp

    CORRECTION
    “9. Political discourse is dominated by feminine and infantile irresponsible intolerance or truth before face”

    It should read Intolerance FOR (or OF) truth before face… Apparently, the ‘f’ key was feeling insensitive today. πŸ˜‰

    Thank you @IvarDiederik for catching…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 18:00:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697670772251042163

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697649965437268424


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    TWITTER WAS THE LAST STRAW BEFORE REVOLUTION?
    Here is the case we make:

    1. This new CEO, Linda Yaccarino, is going to ruin Elon’s ambition for Twitter – our demand for open discourse, and with it, place the final stamp of approval on revolution and civil war – the last straw by removing the last hope.

    2. Elon’s mission to provide a public forum necessary for the presentation of participatory government by informed citizens will fail.

    3. The X-Twitter platform as a political commons is a necessary public service in the preservation of participatory democracy in its conflict with organized social construction of the ‘March through the institutions of cultural production of western civilization and its process of, and demand for, individual responsibility in exchange for individual liberty.”
    Ergo, X-Twitter is political infrastructure not industry.

    4. But as infrastructure masquerading as a business, X-Twitter is bound by the need for subsidy by advertising, (until it can be supported by fees) just as politicians are financed by the financial sector donors.

    5. Advertisers are constrained by the undermining and cancel strategy of the left, which is repeating the Islamic means of suppression that has destroyed seven great civilizations of the ancient world and reduced them to ignorance and ashes of poverty and superstition.

    6. The left’s warfare against civilization relies on the antisocial behavior of the feminine method of warfare by undermining, shrilling, shouting down, canceling, gossiping, shaming, rallying, psychologizing, and moralizing in order to evade rational argument and reasoned discourse. (See “GSRRM”)

    7. So, instead, X-Twitter’s ‘SAFETY” will once again facilitate the spread of his antisocial behavior that is the primary means of undermining our institutions, our rule of law, by the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity, our republican government, our concurrent democratic participation. Why? Because there is no means of non-public resolution of disputes other than adversarial debate. Historically newspapers had asked a set of competent parties to comment, then displayed both sides of an argument, and let the public decide. In some cases there is insufficient evidence to decide (ie: the vaccine question) and we must make a pragmatic decision. But most importantly, our job is to expose evasions, denials, falsehoods, false promises and baitings into hazard by propagandists.

    8. Advertising and marketing programs are bound by the dominance of women in the field, their indoctrination by the academy, and the dominance of women in hyperconsumption, hypergamy, debt accumulation, spending of 70% of household income, and consuming 70% of government resources, while being net tax consumers subsidized by male taxpayers.

    9. Political discourse is dominated by feminine and infantile irresponsible intolerance or truth before face, which is the principle reason that our civilization was able to produce participatory government and rule of law and jury trials.

    10. None of us are any longer bound by the inalienable obligation for truth before face to the public, in public, in matters public.

    11. Through legal activism we are no longer bound by the common law requirement of truth before face, and reciprocity of exchange in matters of public speech.

    12. None of us are any longer bound by limiting ourselves to resolution of conflict by adversarial debate before the jury refereed by a judge.

    13. Through legal activism, we are no longer bound by the common law’s prohibition on conflict outside of truthful reciprocal debate or court – particularly the crimes of defamation regardless of material impact.

    14. Through legal activism against the courts we are no longer bound by demand for concurrency in voting or legislation.

    15. Through the process of deliberate undermining by:
    (a) majoritarian activism and
    (b) enfranchisement of all, regardless of merit,
    (c) direct election of the Senate instead of Senate a proxy for the governor, and
    (d) overwhelming immigration in lieu of demand for full integration, and
    (e) the desperate attempt to circumvent the Electoral College as well;
    … we are no longer bound by concurrency between classes and regions, with a small number of vast immigrant cities attempting to seize the continent as the north did in its war of aggression against the agrarian south.

    16. As such we are no longer bound by the common, natural, concurrent law of self-determination by self-determined means, by reciprocal insurance of sovereignty in demonstrated interests, reciprocity in display word and deed, and inalienability of duty, truth, excellence, and beauty before self, limiting us to voluntary markets for cooperation whether private or public, or truthful reciprocal debate and adversarial competition before a jury of our peers.

    17. As such, as far as I can determine from the evidence:
    (a) We are no longer operating under the rule of the natural law of self-determination that is the only of suppressing conflict and maximizing cooperation.
    (b) We are no longer operating under the process of common law discovery of universal interests in conflict resolution.
    (c) We are no longer operating under the process of voting and legislation by tests of concurrency in agreement of interests between classes and regions.
    (d) Therefore, the state has failed to defend and secure our self-determination by self-determined means, by security of life, liberty, and property (demonstrated interests). And it is time for the replacement of this government and the restoration of our natural rights under our constitution of natural rights obligations and inalienations.
    (d) and the demand for restitution, punishment, and prevention against those who have brought about this criminal condition by sedition and treason both with intent, self-interest at the expense of others, and failure of due diligence against participation in such crimes.

    I think that’s a pretty solid case.
    Let me know what YOU think.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1697649965437268424

  • @TysonBay just want to thank you publicly for your long term daily support and a

    @TysonBay just want to thank you publicly for your long term daily support and advocacy. -hugs


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 15:39:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697635257674088561

  • OMG. Will, just ’cause it you, and you’re humble and honest about it, … it’s f

    OMG. Will, just ’cause it you, and you’re humble and honest about it, … it’s funny. πŸ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 15:38:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697635023451484603

    Reply addressees: @Will_of_Europa

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697634768584581257

  • I share your pain. lol

    I share your pain. lol


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 15:37:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697634739748819266

    Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697630508031566266

  • To have accumulated citations, I would have to pursue publication to obtain them

    To have accumulated citations, I would have to pursue publication to obtain them. And yes, people ask me to publish my work all the time. Because unlike most theorists I’ve had more than one revolutionary insight. But activism and results are all I’m interested in, not stamps of approval, or legitimacy in the academy – any more than Darwin sought it from the Church. And in activism, books matter more than papers. Darwin didn’t publish until he was ready. I have no interest in publishing before I’m ready. And thankfully due to the help of the staff at the institute, we’re progressing nicely.
    So, either you can seek to understand and debate me(us) with intellectual honesty, or you can’t. And so far, I haven’t found anyone who can find a hole in my(our) work anywhere. And that’s the whole point of it.
    Demand for cites is evidence you lack the knowledge to carry the debate on your own. Instead, bring arguments and cites with any objection. Otherwise, demand in lieu of them is childish. And it’s a tiresome, pretentious, effeminate, leftist trope.
    So don’t ask me to serve you in your current state of knowledge and ignorance, when I’m trying to serve mankind and be judged by history.

    Yes, I’m a little annoyed. πŸ˜‰
    This is the ‘pain’ of doing my work in public.
    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 15:36:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697634622794760192

  • Martin adding his usual clarity. πŸ˜‰

    Martin adding his usual clarity. πŸ˜‰ https://twitter.com/TheAutistocrat/status/1697627486048157951

  • ( I think I’m saying the same thing, but I might not have been clear. If so, the

    ( I think I’m saying the same thing, but I might not have been clear. If so, then apologies.)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 15:19:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697630284458373622

    Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697619375031832788

  • (BTW: cute use of whitespace for your alias. πŸ˜‰ )

    (BTW: cute use of whitespace for your alias. πŸ˜‰ )


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-01 15:11:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697628354910806185

    Reply addressees: @PepeFisher

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697618576692203654