I understand herr professor lord saint rudyard quite well and he is correct so often that it astounds me.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-12 17:02:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701642572173828524
Reply addressees: @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701602990392762859
I’m not disagreeing. It’s one thing to stay within the lines, and another thing to countersignal where unhelpful.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-12 13:22:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701587172921401347
Reply addressees: @ThisDeconstruct @ConceptualJames
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701543995338309844
Different issue. Confirms my argument.
Tolerant … until.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-12 13:20:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701586633089269925
Reply addressees: @LogicIllustrat @ConceptualJames
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701549005116002490
Honestly, I don’t even understand your confusion.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-12 08:30:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701513580967768215
Reply addressees: @andreas71047323 @dr_duchesne @SethAbramson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701507721000812932
Let’s try to pull honesty out of you one last time. What did Ricardo ask, and how did I answer? It might help if you just went to original tweet, and then read my responses.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-12 08:21:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701511435858088047
Reply addressees: @fanagoreza @dr_duchesne @SethAbramson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701508683295805887
Answer the question. What did Duchesne ask and what did I answer? Do you understand or not? It’s evident that you don’t. So lets figure out what error you’re making.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-12 08:03:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701506689734779343
Reply addressees: @fanagoreza @dr_duchesne @SethAbramson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701505603514900871
All humans have goals. That’s irrelevant. Argue with the totality of what I presented, without presuming and cherry-picking. (I guarantee I know the science).
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-12 08:01:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701506347764711449
Reply addressees: @bejbiewelcia @datepsych @SteveStuWill @cait_CST
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701505462833729722
Ok. Let’s try to understand who’s correct.
You are clearly leaping to conclusions in the absence of information. I’ve been an activist and public intellectual for decades. You made the claim that there is no war on civilization despite the scholarly agreement. And yet you claim we are declining, yet propose no reason why . I mean, at least from my read, you’re not making sense.
Can you explain what you thing is wrong instead?
Reply addressees: @ChiefComptroll
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-12 08:00:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701505942854967296
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701504847009419691
Like I said. Did you understand Duchesne’s question and my response in that context? No, you didn’t.
Hence why you’re a nitwit, and sperging like all nitwits do.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-12 07:52:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701503928725016640
Reply addressees: @fanagoreza @dr_duchesne @SethAbramson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701501362725404698
Much.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-12 07:36:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701500037795135761
Reply addressees: @bejbiewelcia @datepsych @SteveStuWill @cait_CST
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701494089869410661