I live to serve.
( thank you. 😉 )
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-04 16:34:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1709607907203957202
Reply addressees: @quietgoodnight
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1709598544934384035
I live to serve.
( thank you. 😉 )
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-04 16:34:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1709607907203957202
Reply addressees: @quietgoodnight
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1709598544934384035
I don’t understand the context of this question. Can you give me an example of what you’re trying to understand?
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-03 23:53:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1709355940691005511
Reply addressees: @_MrNational
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1709339542543548793
RE: Academic Job Security?
I dunno. Your security is in fact dicated by both the subject matter of your inquiry, the department you’re in, and the admnistration, all of which, except for econ compsci and physics are highly politicized – with the best universities the most politicized. (The top law schools teach sedition for goodness sake, not responsibility for the polity and law).
I couldn’t put a dissertation committee together for my cross disciplinary work, nor could I take as long as I have with my efforts, nor if I published would I be able to maintain employment. And I work largely in epistemology, economics, and law, and particularly in baiting into hazard, fraud, deception, lying, and denial – and more specifically in sex, political, and civilizational differences in lying. And the results are far more unpleasant for democratic polities than Darwin was for the Church.
So what’s important is very difficult to pursue in the academy. In fact, you are safest pursuing what is unimportant, and in many cases what is false, than what is both important and true.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-03 16:00:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1709236949980995584
Another brilliant piece by our Contrafabian. https://twitter.com/ContraFabianist/status/1709009227124207976
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-03 01:36:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1709019510001238083
https://twitter.com/ContraFabianist/status/1709009227124207976
(FYI, IMO, Rudyard is one of the finest men, of the greatest character, with the most moral ambitions, and disciplined ability I have ever known. It’s rare.)
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-02 22:11:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1708968011544076353
Reply addressees: @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1708888370582094324
(It’s true. Peterson isn’t making it up. .And it’s not a novel observation, but an ancient one.)
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-02 22:10:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1708967620538478788
Reply addressees: @BigSisterCynthi @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1708924473599238322
(Mental Health Issues: It’s because a) you produce great work that is intellectually honest – even when you are compassionate about those who failed or wronged, b) your audience trusts you because of it, c) you are honest about your difficulties and don’t engage in special pleading over it, but instead seek to overcome it.
Why does that matter? The right as cognitively male, always seeks the strength to bear the burden of responsibility – just the mirror opposite of the left that always and everywhere seeks to evade responsibilty.
In other words you’re acting heroically.
That’s why the right doesn’t object or defame you.)
Reply addressees: @whatifalthist
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-02 22:08:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1708967286575411200
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1708888370582094324
That link is
https://naturallawinstitute.com/2016/09/the-anti-rothbardian-libertarian-canon/
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-02 22:03:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1708965963045957848
Reply addressees: @LudwigArisleib @StephaneGeyres @FromKulak @ViandeTiede666 @paulericblanrue @arthurhomines
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1708926085239312729
Old but solid posts on mises, rothbard, and Hoppe.
I have a draft of a book on this subject but I didn’t want it to anchor me as a libertarian or such so we never produced a final draft and submitted it for publication.
I might be willing to share that draft with the right…
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-02 22:02:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1708965814542512524
Reply addressees: @LudwigArisleib @StephaneGeyres @FromKulak @ViandeTiede666 @paulericblanrue @arthurhomines
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1708926085239312729
No but I’ll take a look and see what she said. Maybe I can riff off it too. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-02 21:24:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1708956067038732390
Reply addressees: @UglyTexas
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1708952166835077130