Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

Typo:
You wanna talk about this?
Because I can understand why people might have thought that when we were trying to convert the ‘lost boys’ from riotous malcontents that kept getting beaten into a political movement. And look where that got us…. canceled.

My goal all along, since I started in the early 90s, has been “A civil war is a deterministic outcome and due within a certain date range. So I am trying to produce a solution that will either prevent it, or allow us to settle it, or allow us to reconstruct after it.” That’s what I work on. The law is just the means of engineering that solution – for the benefit of all.

The fact that I started to use social media is only because it is an exceptional vehicle for performing research on human behavior by provoking people’s moral instincts, and recording how they offensively promote, or defensivly justify their moral instincts – because almost none if it is reason. Just instinct justified by words.

The fact that the Right picked up on my work first was likely simply because I was addressing the taboos, because taboos are a means of civilizational denial of the truth that is uncomfortable or harmful given the group’s evolutionary strategy.

I’m about as straight a talker as you’ll find. There are very few things I can’t or won’t tell you – just to protect others.

But I’ve spent enough time with the FBI in my house that it should be clear that they are concerned that if I wanted to kick off a civil war, that I could, and they want me to ‘behave sensibly’ (not inspire anyone to do anything foolish), and that I don’t pay attention to the paranoid lost boys because of the harm they did to us already. So we moved on to mainstream folk with families and responsibilities.

And I don’t give up because the stakes are … well. Higher than at any time since the fall of rome.

So for me this is a moral ambition that I’ve given my life to.

Cheers

Reply addressees: @EsLebeFreiheit @whatifalthist