Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

So (a) I dispute the point (b) I addressed the point correctly the first time, (c) so now i’ve thorougly addressed the point inescapably, and (d) in doing so demonstrated that I do not hold amaturish beliefs based on limited knowledge as you do, but that I disagreed becasue you were simply absurdly wrong, because as I argued you have a comic book understanding of these matters.

You could have answered this question by a set of google queries, rather than assuming your ‘impressions’ are true. Instead you wasted my time.

When someone like me deigns to interact with you then at least have the good grace to ask questions and seek to understand rather than assume you have even the vaguest idea what you’re talking about.

You’re welcome.

Reply addressees: @TheBest0pinions @NatLawInstitute @vyomaga

I suspect you think there is meaning in your response, but that is only because you only grasp your frame of reference and therefore are unaware of permutations on the same theme. There is no equivalent to fascism because there was no possibility of that level of control of the economy. I suspect what you are conflating is the dictatorial powers granted in time of war during the republic or some presumption that the imperial phase was somehow fascist. I dunno. Because you’re effeminate outbursts under pretense of argument aren’t clearn enough. I’ve tolerated a series of your amateurish bits for two days now. I can tolerate a bit more but otherwise you’re an adolescent waste of time.

Reply addressees: @TheBest0pinions @NatLawInstitute @vyomaga