Can you rephrase the question?
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 16:24:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714316388154712136
Reply addressees: @rjunkapoor
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714288355935142156
Can you rephrase the question?
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 16:24:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714316388154712136
Reply addressees: @rjunkapoor
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714288355935142156
It’s very difficult to debate me on these issues. I don’t know anyone who can. (yes that’s a bit of bait so that we might discuss it for fun.)
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 15:32:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714303461712388141
Reply addressees: @Alex70008182 @Breedlove22
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714302432048533932
Why do you feel comfortable addressing by my first name? We are not familiars. Do you know what such rudeness demonstrates about you?
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 01:32:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714091915275083871
Reply addressees: @DavidDa111877
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714089261933432884
Sorry. Let me help you. I had thyroid cancer. You had the lobotomy. I understand why you’re easily confused. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 22:25:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714045029130338455
Reply addressees: @LuizFDMG1 @Ramendesk @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714041124753465616
They didn’t go anywhere.
We didn’t MAKE them.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 20:46:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714019907086455202
Reply addressees: @J58039716 @DouglasKMurray
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714008872284008800
Yes’ I’m agreeing with your assertion. IMO the clarification is easy if you simply start with that statement and then continue with the proof, and close with restatement of the assert as a therefore.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 19:44:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714004402124496925
Reply addressees: @ContraFabianist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713705250337816986
Technically I’m a genius and a polymath by every single measure. I mean. It’s more likely you’re just both disabled, ignorant, and wrong. (Statistically that is.)
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 19:35:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714002255798485363
Reply addressees: @Captain_Alley @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713999388547199139
(you interpret it as despite the evidence, instead of despit the beliefs of conservatives and libertarians)
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 18:21:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713983419527377118
Reply addressees: @SaitouHajime00
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713982058522132980
I live to serve. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 17:59:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713977917821141112
Reply addressees: @DavidVDriessen
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713975929775767673
You know william, you say some smart sh**t pretty often.
Yes. That’s mostly true. That’s a useful frame. Though it’s the anglos, the americans just picked up the pieces post war.
However, the americans understand that empires are a agrarian age, and the world wars, and the american attempt at free trade to bribe countries into a federation of nation states with each civ led by a core state that’s resposible for it’s members, will economically outcompete any empire.
So Russia, china, and iran are trying to maintain th eage of empires. And only because they suit the fanatasies of teh ruling class.
America on the other hand is a sh-hole speading woke on top of it’s ambigions and that needs to be divorced and suppressed.
Reply addressees: @William68332190 @bryanbrey
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-16 17:36:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713972123755061248
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1713968591341502628