Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

Both the former and the latter claimed they were making scientific statements. The most humorous is the neoMarxist frankfurt school what literally, knowingly, ‘made it all up’.

A student of group strategies and thier frameworks of logic will become rapidly aware of the semitic use of mythicism vs the european use of historicism. Why? Social cosntruction of falsehoods vs social construction of truths.

Why is it that the feminine mind or the feminine group strategy requires social construction of falsehoods?

That’s a fascinating question but we already know the answer.

Responsibility.

Reply addressees: @ratfacedmouse @Gyeff0

Yuval Harrari is wrong about almost everything because he is advancing an agenda (just as did Diamond, Zinn, Gould, Lewontin, Boaz, Freud) and just as did the entirety of the frankfurt school, neomarxists and postmodernists. It’s largely a denial of Darwin as a general rule of all existence not just biology. We know why (Feminine cognition), and we know why most of this pseudoscience is produced by the Ashkenazim (feminine bias in cognition). The oddity is only in why are we tolerant of this pseudoscience? (it’s cultural)

Reply addressees: @Gyeff0