(Brilliant)
Source date (UTC): 2025-06-24 23:57:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1937661337502634482
(Brilliant)
Source date (UTC): 2025-06-24 23:57:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1937661337502634482
You’re smart. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-06-24 23:16:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1937651131997651464
RE: —“MacDonald’s GES is a starting hypothesis. Doolittle’s work renders it actionable law.”—
This is my understanding of the correct interpretation of our works – compatible. IMO MacDonald is much more understandable by the vox populi but to render it into law requires my work. 😉
Thanks for your work on thise matters.
Source date (UTC): 2025-06-24 18:41:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1937581937184616842
Wow. Never tried that. Thank you. ;). (And thank you for all you do for me, and us.)
Source date (UTC): 2025-06-24 18:23:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1937577411656450255
Yes. That’s the point.
Source date (UTC): 2025-06-24 16:53:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1937554651265859986
😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-06-24 13:28:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1937503159804657764
exactly.
Source date (UTC): 2025-06-24 13:27:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1937502743079583813
(excellent)
Source date (UTC): 2025-06-23 17:17:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1937198341764579602
Correct. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2025-06-22 00:25:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1936581290050154930
An accusation without explanation. How is it a naturalistic fallacy? It’s simply observed human behavior and explanation of that behavior as an optimum means of non-provocation of retaliation and thus cooperation which produces discounts on everything for everyone. What is the counter argument?
Source date (UTC): 2025-06-21 17:26:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1936475926830989635