Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

😉

While @Aarvoll avoids me because he thinks I’m a fed or something silly like that, I know him personally, am a supporter, and can testify that he’s the real deal, genuine in his moral conviction, and his mission on behalf of the people.

I don’t think your comment makes much sense, even if the first and second phrase are true, the third is irrelevant, and neither contradicts the reading of aristotle quoted in the post.

Most philosophers in history do manage to come to this conclusion – it’s just that that phrase it differently. But yes, in this case, Kant is right. 😉

I cant recall ever disagreeing with @pmarca’s opinion on anything of substance … and thats over the past thirty years.

You aren’t missing anything.

RL: I think these personal reflections and criticisms are more effective than scientific and logical arguments.

You are a master communicator. Seriously.

RT @TheMcMullan: @curtdoolittle https://t.co/OHYwLFLm2B

(True)