You are a very wise man. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 09:11:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742111336773845402
Reply addressees: @DRolandAnderson @aldafa_ir
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742062165732012543
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
If that is the point then what is the point of it at all?
If that is the point then what is the point of it at all?
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 09:06:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742110032953475385
Reply addressees: @JohnSmi55895339
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742109100316532951
-
It’s not ‘beauty’ that has nothing to do with it
It’s not ‘beauty’ that has nothing to do with it.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 03:25:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742024189685444675
Reply addressees: @MaximusVesuvius
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742023825540223219
-
Aquinas and Smith were more corect than Hume in this case
Aquinas and Smith were more corect than Hume in this case.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 03:24:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742023950232645787
Reply addressees: @KalDore87 @romanstatue_ @SydSteyerhart
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742018639648211256
-
(Correct. That’s it exactly. 😉 )
(Correct. That’s it exactly. 😉 )
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 03:21:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742023382932049990
Reply addressees: @americanhrathe
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742020597993865532
-
Not an argument. Needs one. 😉
Not an argument. Needs one. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 02:52:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742016033831932022
Reply addressees: @HJoshington
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742014301424980306
-
(correct.)
(correct.)
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 02:50:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742015524366651766
Reply addressees: @Obediencio1
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742014209045455251
-
(women)
(women)
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 02:36:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742012002103390707
Reply addressees: @MindEnjoyer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742009975415677266
-
Yes it is. 😉 lol
Yes it is. 😉 lol
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-02 02:10:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742005306593284424
Reply addressees: @aldafa_ir
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742004154221150292
-
The ultimate question, yes? I operate under the assumption that we must exhaust
The ultimate question, yes? I operate under the assumption that we must exhaust all possibilities first, but the number of those possibilities is shrinking rapidly. IMO under the right conditions the govt will surrender as it did in the civil rights era. That only took about three weeks. But though I have promised I wont advocat for it or encourage it, I have done enough work to know how to win that war to win it if necessary.
Reply addressees: @Stealth_Bandit @Flavus59
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-01 01:39:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741635321609977856
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741618449644724692