That’s a good thing. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 21:35:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745560197165171180
Reply addressees: @partymember55 @pdbanalysts
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745550549766869437
That’s a good thing. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 21:35:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745560197165171180
Reply addressees: @partymember55 @pdbanalysts
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745550549766869437
yes, though I don’t consider it a problem. lol What in particular would you like to know?
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 21:33:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745559679185399989
Reply addressees: @partymember55
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745558113107788074
MK- Can’t find it. Link?
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 19:25:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745527340531175658
Reply addressees: @marsden_katana @charlesmurray
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745525802937069761
@charlesmurray Just re-reading Human Accomplishment, and twenty years later I’m still struck by the insight and contribution to the understanding of mankind.
Thank you for the work you have done on behalf of all of us.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 19:11:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745523934735237394
I give it up slowly and with regret. But yes, you are correct. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 18:59:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745520798289350775
Reply addressees: @teodoriancu14
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745518092111827007
Apologies for the assumption and the implication. I should have chosen my words more carefully -which is an accident of doing too may things at once.
I am quite a ware of this research and much more of it – it’s one of my core competencies. And even then, this reserach does not tell us that women can’t be taught despite their intuitions. (religion is silly and non logical but we teach it.) However, that does not mean that there is no means of including women in political processes until … I am certain there is no means of doing so. 😉
Reply addressees: @Gundissemenator
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 18:41:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745516349596516352
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745511383070912527
Well done. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 13:07:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745432330896904228
Reply addressees: @unfazedtranny
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745430515539485085
Good argument (mostly) – though I would position the zeppelin – yes – tool/ perfect circle continuity of sophistication as doing both.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 13:05:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745431838602957052
Reply addressees: @sneed_cant
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745326103017705878
RT @LukeWeinhagen: Related –
https://twitter.com/LukeWeinhagen/status/1644120522949533696
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 04:02:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745295048269275484
https://twitter.com/LukeWeinhagen/status/1644120522949533696
Yes.
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-11 03:57:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745293816645423509
Reply addressees: @TabbyTeamster
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745291591407854068