Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

You made an accusation. That accusation originated my response. And yes, I used the term correctly.
I don’t think you owe me anything. I state that you are engaged in sophomoric deception by claiming your definition and understanding falsify mine – yet you can’t and won’t substantiate that claim and accusation.
Natural law is not a difficult subject, it merely has a long history of attempts at justification and context. Greek origins, Christian attempts at supernatural capture, Aquinian attempt at synthesis, Anglo expression as common law foundation – effectively a science, uniting morality and law, and defense against positive law.
And again, please attempt to suppress your feminine intuition at gossiping, shaming, ridiculing, rallying, moralizing and psychologizing, as a defense against malinvestment in your priors, resistance to adapation, and accusation and ad hom undermining as your own personal and social therapy.

You aren’t very bright, intellectually honest, or very good at argumentation and debate. You aren’t even very good at feminine evasion posturing undermining and social construction. Rather amateurish really.

Try honesty. State your definition and make your case, exit the argument, or gracefully admit your failure – though I am confident you’ll never do so. It’s a feminine trait to never admit error.

Reply addressees: @DouglasGOsborne @TuckerCarlson