Curt Doolittle

Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • Eli on Violence

    Eli on Violence.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-27 16:14:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    Darling of the Dark Enlightenment: The Aristocratic & Radical Traditionalist Julius Evola

    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-26 12:41:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-26 11:18:00 UTC

  • CRASH AND BURN Well, it didnt take Piketty to get thrown of the Rogoff cliff. Le

    CRASH AND BURN

    Well, it didnt take Piketty to get thrown of the Rogoff cliff. Left loses their contender too.

    Couldnt happen to a nicer guy.

    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-24 06:33:00 UTC

  • THEFT OUTLINE

    http://time.com/106319/heres-what-chinese-hackers-actually-stole-from-u-s-companies/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+timeblogs%2Fcurious_capitalist+%28TIME%3A+Business%29CHINESE THEFT OUTLINE

    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-21 05:11:00 UTC

  • Are Bryan Caplan’s Views Taken Seriously By The Economics Establishment?

    One measure is the difficulty in getting into the economics program at GMU. And it’s non trivial.  There is quite a bit of demand there.  I think Brian has made a niche for himself as someone who thinks outside the box in certain areas and for that reason I think he’s taken seriously.  The problem is more one of the question you’re asking.  That is “the establishment”.  There is no such consensus in economics that one could call ‘the establishment’, on anything other than some pretty broad brush concepts.  There are a large number of people who support the investment and government communities.  There are fewer who handle social issues.  So economics is a set of biases and specialties and it’s useful to look at thinkers in the context of their niche, not so much as whether they’re mainstream or not.

    https://www.quora.com/Are-Bryan-Caplans-views-taken-seriously-by-the-economics-establishment

  • Are Bryan Caplan’s Views Taken Seriously By The Economics Establishment?

    One measure is the difficulty in getting into the economics program at GMU. And it’s non trivial.  There is quite a bit of demand there.  I think Brian has made a niche for himself as someone who thinks outside the box in certain areas and for that reason I think he’s taken seriously.  The problem is more one of the question you’re asking.  That is “the establishment”.  There is no such consensus in economics that one could call ‘the establishment’, on anything other than some pretty broad brush concepts.  There are a large number of people who support the investment and government communities.  There are fewer who handle social issues.  So economics is a set of biases and specialties and it’s useful to look at thinkers in the context of their niche, not so much as whether they’re mainstream or not.

    https://www.quora.com/Are-Bryan-Caplans-views-taken-seriously-by-the-economics-establishment

  • INTELLECTUAL MALPRACTICE SUIT AGAINST JARED DIAMOND IN THE MAKING. Diseases are

    http://santiagotimes.cl/qa-european-contact-land-use-led-easter-island-collapse/ANOTHER INTELLECTUAL MALPRACTICE SUIT AGAINST JARED DIAMOND IN THE MAKING.

    Diseases are the best weapon ever.

    Fragility created by exceeding the limits of the institutions of cooperation from providing correct information and therefore incentives, followed, by shocks that collapse the fragile system.

    (Dear fragility makers. We are coming for you. And there is nothing you can do to stop it.)

    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-20 08:13:00 UTC

  • “The name of peace is sweet, and the thing itself is beneficial, but there is a

    “The name of peace is sweet, and the thing itself is beneficial, but there is a great difference between peace and servitude. Peace is freedom in tranquility, servitude is the worst of all evils, to be resisted not only by war, but even by death.” – Cicero

    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-19 10:17:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=9f6_1399588813&comments=1

    Source date (UTC): 2014-05-19 07:19:00 UTC