MORE ON LESTER’S JUSTIFICATIONARY NONSENSE.
(archived from elsewhere)
Lee
ie: Unless you or anyone else can demonstrate that our cooperative emotions (moral intuitions), and our pre-cooperative emotions, that inform us (reward and punish us) for acquisition and defense of that which we have born costs to hold or obtain – physical costs – then no, it is IMPOSSIBLE for a pre-propertarian cause of liberty. Period. It is however, possible to state, that our satisfaction or distress is dependent upon the imposition of costs by others.
So. No. Sorry. Lesterianism = Tautology. A “Word Game”.
The operational definition of liberty is a condition in which interpersonal moral constraints, are enforced upon political organizations. Where moral constraints prohibit imposition of costs (free riding). Where costs are imposed upon one’s property.
Property rights are a contract for insurance by others that limits the enforcement of the prohibition on the imposition of costs to those that are disruptive to the reproductive, productive, and institutional orders.
Motion, Memory, Acquisitiveness, Subjective Value, Property, Cooperation, Morality, Property Rights and Liberty, all refer to a sequence of sets of necessary properties, and are invariant no matter how you verbalize them, from which observer’s perspective you verbalize them, and how you verbally justify them.
Lester gave us another bit of rationalist nonsense to use as justification, but it’s just another bit of rationalist nonsense to use as justification, and not a description of necessary and sufficient causal relations.
It’s intellectually embarrassing really. But then, an awful lot of libertarian tripe is intellectually embarrassing. Because nearly all political tripe is intellectually embarrassing justification for obtaining what our reproductive strategies demand of us.
There is no exit from the box. As far as I can tell this is a settled question.
Cheers.
Source date (UTC): 2015-02-04 02:19:00 UTC