http://www.theimaginativeconservative.org/2015/09/russian-intrigue-deja-vu-all-over-again.htmlREAD THIS TODAY
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-03 06:35:00 UTC
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
I agree. 🙂 Not that I disagree with you often. 😉
I agree. 🙂 Not that I disagree with you often. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-01 13:15:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638701713290067968
Reply addressees: @ne0colonial @Outsideness
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638690252517974016
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638690252517974016
-
would like to add that we help people when a crisis is not a moral one, and we e
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/30/opinion/the-trick-to-acting-heroically.html?mwrsm=FacebookI would like to add that we help people when a crisis is not a moral one, and we equally instinctively avoid helping others when the crisis is a moral one.
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-01 11:40:00 UTC
-
I wasn’t writing a thorough analysis of NRx, I was just responding to a post on
I wasn’t writing a thorough analysis of NRx, I was just responding to a post on its limits. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-01 09:50:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638650064471236608
Reply addressees: @Outsideness @SanguineEmpiric @MatthewRenauld
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638643403207512065
IN REPLY TO:
@Outsideness
@SanguineEmpiric @curtdoolittle @MatthewRenauld A critique of MM would have earned that ‘obviously’. Not sure response to an HRx post does.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638643403207512065
-
Thanks. No hard feelings. We all do it. – And I agree with you that we can produ
Thanks. No hard feelings. We all do it. – And I agree with you that we can produce scientific output. 😉 -Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-01 04:18:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638566662854328320
Reply addressees: @MatthewRenauld
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638528171185274881
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638528171185274881
-
I hardly agreed with the author. I hardly disagreed with the content. I stated t
I hardly agreed with the author. I hardly disagreed with the content. I stated that criticism is not viable solution.
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-01 00:14:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638505085354557440
Reply addressees: @MatthewRenauld
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638439952779358208
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638439952779358208
-
And you are demonstrating by your words, the reason for the limited reach of the
And you are demonstrating by your words, the reason for the limited reach of the program. You’re the problem.
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-01 00:11:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638504540082438144
Reply addressees: @MatthewRenauld
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638439952779358208
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638439952779358208
-
You mean I don’t agree with you, right? And I’m clearly acquainted. I may be rig
You mean I don’t agree with you, right? And I’m clearly acquainted. I may be right or wrong, but you must demonstrate it.
Source date (UTC): 2015-09-01 00:06:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638503084608618497
Reply addressees: @MatthewRenauld
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638439952779358208
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638439952779358208
-
So you mean you still don’t have a criticism, but are going to rally and shame l
So you mean you still don’t have a criticism, but are going to rally and shame like a little gossiping ‘b_tch’? 😉
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-31 19:47:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638438015644385282
Reply addressees: @MatthewRenauld
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638345808333549569
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638345808333549569
-
So you mean you don’t have any substantive criticism, and are resorting to name
So you mean you don’t have any substantive criticism, and are resorting to name calling? 😉 Right? (Yes).
Source date (UTC): 2015-08-31 11:47:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638317296251990016
Reply addressees: @MatthewRenauld @Outsideness
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638203514619981824
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638203514619981824