Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • Untitled


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-25 02:22:00 UTC

  • A fact that both says something good about the Russian people, and confirms he s

    A fact that both says something good about the Russian people, and confirms he should end propagandism.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-24 21:33:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/669267569833058309

    Reply addressees: @Max_Fisher @ezraklein @amandataub

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/669254298476367872


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/669254298476367872

  • YOURSELF: LEARN SOMETHING VERY IMPORTANT ABOUT ART Stephen Hicks on 20th Century

    http://www.stephenhicks.org/2015/11/24/the-state-of-the-art-world-late-2015-edition/ARM YOURSELF: LEARN SOMETHING VERY IMPORTANT ABOUT ART

    Stephen Hicks on 20th Century Art

    HICKS: WHY ART BECAME UGLY

    http://atlassociety.org/students/students-blog/3671-why-art-became-ugly

    HICKS: THE MOST IMPORTANT ARTEST OF THE CENTURY

    http://www.everyjoe.com/2014/12/18/lifestyle/most-important-artist-of-the-century/#1

    HICKS: TAKING MODERN ARTISTS AT THEIR WORD

    http://www.everyjoe.com/2014/09/11/lifestyle/taking-modern-artists-word/

    HICKS: THE STATE OF THE ART WORLD 2015

    http://www.stephenhicks.org/2015/11/24/the-state-of-the-art-world-late-2015-edition/

    All,

    Reading these pieces again tonight (sitting in my usual hotel room, listening to the traffic and occasional soviet-era street car roll by in old Kiev, four blocks from the Dniepr) I think I can and should augment Stephen’s work with a propertarian analysis (property-en-toto, acquisitions, incentives). So maybe that’s how I’ll handle my chapter on aesthetics… hmm…

    ( h/t Stephen Hicks )


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-24 16:31:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://t.co/yLOf7Ibet9

    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-24 10:01:00 UTC

  • Stats are that people don’t LIKE to either LIVE or WORK in them. They are monume

    Stats are that people don’t LIKE to either LIVE or WORK in them. They are monuments.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-23 19:22:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/668872240289681408

    Reply addressees: @TheEconomist @Outsideness

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/667539807317413889


    IN REPLY TO:

    @TheEconomist

    Up to 1990, the tallest buildings were almost always built in North America. Not any more https://t.co/VoJ5UjOUpj https://t.co/M4mBw9jyFf

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/667539807317413889

  • (You know, that if you work in a university you can’t even speak the truth, let

    (You know, that if you work in a university you can’t even speak the truth, let alone call some internet-loser an effeminate douchebag just for the joy of it because… you can. lol I have no problem slumming. It’s, well, character building. lol)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-23 15:18:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    https://www.youtube.com/attribution_link?a=MynETeL3S4M&u=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DChdGe2YxVmA%26feature%3Dshare

    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-23 12:51:00 UTC

  • He was correct both in engineering and aesthetics. His context was that we shoul

    He was correct both in engineering and aesthetics. His context was that we should build something even better. (shame on you)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-23 06:01:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/668670640568852480

    Reply addressees: @MarkHarrisNYC

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/668528547028447232


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/668528547028447232

  • Do I really need to spend more time on Friedman, or is a total damnation of the

    Do I really need to spend more time on Friedman, or is a total damnation of the first ten pages indicative of the content of the rest? #tlot


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-22 13:29:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/668420985239019520

  • From Jim’s Blog: “Yes, we are at war with Islam”

    [A]nd always have been. For over a thousand years, a multitude of nations, states, peoples, cultures, religions, and empires have attempted to coexist with Islam. None have succeeded. We will not be the first. If you have a few percent of Muslims, you have what you can pretend is a major crime problem. If you have ten to thirty percent, you have a low level civil war, which intermittently becomes a high level civil war whenever you relax or show signs of weakness. If you have thirty percent, you can have a fairly tense peace, like the not-quite-war in Mindanao if you have a large well disciplined military, guards and soldiers everywhere, and regularly and routinely deploy death squads, but you cannot afford rule of law – you can have peace only by ruthlessly and unhesitatingly applying the laws of war. With a large Muslim minority you need death squads and the routine and frequent application of torture to keep the almost-peace, the not-quite-war. France has five or ten percent Muslims, regular car burnings, Calais has been burning for some time, and the French state has no power over substantial areas that have been successfully seized by Islam. France has taken pretend measures – checking passports at major entry points. This is security theater. Calais continues to burn, and the French authorities avert their eyes. Muslim illegal immigrants continue to flood over the borders unopposed. Rapes by Muslims are piously ignored. Preachers continue to preach terror, and while Muslim preachers preach terror, the French authorities arrest and prosecute Marine LePen and Eric Zemmour for incitement. A Muslim that gets over the border cannot be deported. Far from France getting serious about stopping terror, it remains a criminal offense to advocate getting serious about the problem. Under recent international law you cannot return people unless their country of origin agrees to accept them, or at least that is how international law has recently come to be interpreted. And the countries of origin never agree. Australia and Israel have been cheerfully breaking this law, and New Zealand has been furtively breaking it. Burma has been dumping Muslims into boats and telling them that if they want to live under Islam, start sailing to a Muslim country. When France rounds up illegals and dumps them in Africa or the Middle East, then France will be beginning to get serious. But no one can imagine such a thing, let alone propose it, for to imagine such a thing is a thought crime. France is absolutely unserious about dealing with terrorism, and to even think seriously about dealing with terrorism is a crime no Frenchman will admit to committing. The only good Muslim is a bad Muslim. If a Muslim is not murdering innocents and raping children, he does not take his religion seriously.