Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response

  • Philip Saunders Frames The Narrative Correctly

    [F]rom Philip:

    “The operating philosophy of the 20th century was relativism in the domain of ideas, combined with universalism in the realm of institutions. This expressed itself in the subjectivistic movements of modernism and postmodernism, combined with the socio-economic trends of communism, fascism and statist neoliberalism. “The 21st century is the polar opposite. With unlimited access to information and global connectivity, we’re moving towards more universalism in the domain of ideas, culture and philosophy (which is not to be misunderstood for homogeneity, but rather the belief that there are universal standards by which ideologies or cultures can be judged or disputed), combined with relativism in the domain of institutions. “

  • Philip Saunders Frames The Narrative Correctly

    [F]rom Philip:

    “The operating philosophy of the 20th century was relativism in the domain of ideas, combined with universalism in the realm of institutions. This expressed itself in the subjectivistic movements of modernism and postmodernism, combined with the socio-economic trends of communism, fascism and statist neoliberalism. “The 21st century is the polar opposite. With unlimited access to information and global connectivity, we’re moving towards more universalism in the domain of ideas, culture and philosophy (which is not to be misunderstood for homogeneity, but rather the belief that there are universal standards by which ideologies or cultures can be judged or disputed), combined with relativism in the domain of institutions. “

  • ON SO CALLED BANNED BOOKS THAT ARE MERELY INCOMPETENT (re: RT story on supposedl

    ON SO CALLED BANNED BOOKS THAT ARE MERELY INCOMPETENT

    (re: RT story on supposedly banned books that aren’t)

    Cosmopolitan (Ashkenazi) Marxist Critique in the form of Conspiracy Theories that can be explained as rational political incentives necessary to constrain the murderous expansion of Cosmopolitan (Ashkenazi) Marxist World Communism, by immoral people who have no moral intuitions, and no moral tradition, and no history of their own ability to hold territory against encroaching evil.

    Some of the easiest markers of ‘critique’ are (a) the heaping of undue praise not met by market evidence, (b) the use of loaded and framed language rather than the analysis of rational incentives of the individuals involved (c) the use of moral argument instead of economic argument, (d) emphasis on the criticism of competing ideas rather than defense of the proposed idea.

    The person being interviewed demonstrates all four of these (a, b,c, d) methods of Cosmopolitan (Ashkenazi) Marxist Critique, as well as borderline schizophrenic paranoia.

    Books are marginalized because they demonstrate leaps of logic only possible for the borderline schizophrenic. That is because conspiracy theories that can be explained by Occam’s Razor as the result of rational incentives by normal moral people, can ONLY be analyzed as does the speaker and the books’ authors as the bias of borderline schizophrenic minds.

    I’ll tell you all you need to know about the CIA: It’s a bunch of nerds trying to collect gossip and rumor in order to prevent the politicians from fantasizing just like this speaker does. The purpose of intelligence is to CONSTRAIN political action whenever possible. And that’s what the nerds pretty much do.

    This man will undoubtably be ignored just as all the books he mentions, as well as all his ilk are. Because they’re laughable.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-02 06:44:00 UTC

  • THE CHURCH OF TED Why does TED function as a ‘Church’ for progressives? (Because

    THE CHURCH OF TED

    Why does TED function as a ‘Church’ for progressives?

    (Because TED sells the promise of infinite bounty – consumption without constraint).

    And there are no heterosexual males involved in its production.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-02 05:27:00 UTC

  • Actually I don’t know the manosphere, red pill, nrx, alt-right, shitlord lingo.

    Actually I don’t know the manosphere, red pill, nrx, alt-right, shitlord lingo. I read science and economics and stuff like books, journals and papers. And Ieave the fun stuff to the fun guys. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-30 06:36:00 UTC

  • COMMENT: –“You are so bad…. After reading you I look at people on the streets

    COMMENT: –“You are so bad…. After reading you I look at people on the streets like other people look at animals at the zoo”—Anon.

    My mission is complete. lol ‘Cause you should. They are. 😉 People’s opinions are not to be taken very seriously. They are just gene expressions.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-30 06:34:00 UTC

  • (PK is a master of lying by using a half truth loaded with rallying and shaming.

    (PK is a master of lying by using a half truth loaded with rallying and shaming. It is the ultimate form of obfuscation.)


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-30 01:37:00 UTC

  • Awesome

    Awesome.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-29 07:22:00 UTC

  • Actually Julie. That is a really interesting question. If I get a chance I’ll ad

    Actually Julie. That is a really interesting question. If I get a chance I’ll address why they do.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-28 21:13:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/670712023810969600

    Reply addressees: @GinaAvondo @JulieBorowski @thor_benson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/670711342341464065


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/670711342341464065

  • Why did it teach that? It did so for a reason. 😉

    Why did it teach that? It did so for a reason. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2015-11-28 21:09:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/670711050887667712

    Reply addressees: @neon_shadows @JulieBorowski

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/670701750081335296


    IN REPLY TO:

    @neon_shadows

    @JulieBorowski the Church has always taught that birth control is morally impermissible

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/670701750081335296