[P]rogressives cannot tell the difference between wishful thinking and deceit. And when they came they prefer deceit. Lying is necessary to frame kleptocracy as virtuous, theft as moral and dysgenia as good.
Category: Commentary, Critique, and Response
-
With the word “commons” in it , you might be interested
With the word “commons” in it , you might be interested.
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-06 07:28:00 UTC
-
I LOVE WOMEN. OMG. LIKE FLOWERS. NEVER ENOUGH OF THEM IN THE WORLD. F_ck the fem
I LOVE WOMEN. OMG. LIKE FLOWERS. NEVER ENOUGH OF THEM IN THE WORLD.
F_ck the feminists. All women are beautiful. Just stop putting so much crap in your mouth, and spend more time prattling about nonsense. lol
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-06 05:44:00 UTC
-
WATCH, MAYBE TWICE: MOLYNEUX ROCKS IT ON THE CRUSADES
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ilFbbk9jw4MUST WATCH, MAYBE TWICE: MOLYNEUX ROCKS IT ON THE CRUSADES
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-05 18:48:00 UTC
-
All My Posts Referencing Rothbard’s Ghetto Ethics
[H]UMOR OR SARCASM OR TRUTH? All my posts referencing Rothbard’s Ghetto Ethics. http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/?s=ghetto+ethics
-
All My Posts Referencing Rothbard’s Ghetto Ethics
[H]UMOR OR SARCASM OR TRUTH? All my posts referencing Rothbard’s Ghetto Ethics. http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/?s=ghetto+ethics
-
OR SARCASM OR TRUTH? All my posts referencing Rothbard’s Ghetto Ethics
http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/?s=ghetto+ethicsHUMOR OR SARCASM OR TRUTH?
All my posts referencing Rothbard’s Ghetto Ethics.
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-05 05:25:00 UTC
-
first impression that’s hard but if I can think of something insightful I will.
first impression that’s hard but if I can think of something insightful I will. I disagree with Stratfor on this I think.
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-04 14:09:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/684013750337298432
Reply addressees: @SimonNight
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/683993168958849024
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/683993168958849024
-
Can’t prove it yet. But someone will
Can’t prove it yet. But someone will.
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-04 12:03:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/683982123196379136
Reply addressees: @FriedrichHayek
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/683981947325050880
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@FriedrichHayek FWIW: Test of Hayekian analysis ~requires simulations not just models. Operations not calculations. Decisions not measures.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/683981947325050880
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@FriedrichHayek FWIW: Test of Hayekian analysis ~requires simulations not just models. Operations not calculations. Decisions not measures.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/683981947325050880
-
Reference Alice? (count me clueless)
Reference Alice? (count me clueless)
Source date (UTC): 2016-01-04 11:31:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/683974078001197056
Reply addressees: @AliceTeller
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/683785055077036032
IN REPLY TO:
@AliceTeller
Start out as a trans-humanist who can speak to the elite, settle for leading white trash. So much potential lost, sad.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/683785055077036032